View and print project details including project summary, purpose, associations to Biological Opinions, and area. To learn more about any of the project properties, hold your mouse cursor over the field label.
Province | Subbasin | % |
---|---|---|
Mountain Columbia | Blackfoot | 100.00% |
To view all expenditures for all fiscal years, click "Project Exp. by FY"
To see more detailed project budget information, please visit the "Project Budget" page
Number | Contractor Name | Title | Status | Total Contracted Amount | Dates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
33129 SOW | Trout Unlimited (TU) | 2007-235-00 EXP BLACKFOOT RIVER SUBBASIN PLAN | History | $32,266 | 6/1/2007 - 9/30/2008 |
39093 SOW | Trout Unlimited (TU) | 2007-235-00 EXP BLACKFOOT RIVER SUBBASIN PLAN | History | $44,995 | 9/1/2008 - 10/31/2009 |
Annual Progress Reports | |
---|---|
Expected (since FY2004): | 2 |
Completed: | 2 |
On time: | 2 |
Status Reports | |
---|---|
Completed: | 10 |
On time: | 3 |
Avg Days Late: | 105 |
Count of Contract Deliverables | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Earliest Contract | Subsequent Contracts | Title | Contractor | Earliest Start | Latest End | Latest Status | Accepted Reports | Complete | Green | Yellow | Red | Total | % Green and Complete | Canceled |
33129 | 39093 | 2007-235-00 EXP BLACKFOOT RIVER SUBBASIN PLAN | Trout Unlimited (TU) | 06/01/2007 | 10/31/2009 | History | 10 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 100.00% | 0 |
Project Totals | 10 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 100.00% | 0 |
Assessment Number: | 2007-235-00-NPCC-20090924 |
---|---|
Project: | 2007-235-00 - Blackfoot River Subbasin Plan |
Review: | FY07-09 Solicitation Review |
Approved Date: | 10/23/2006 |
Recommendation: | Fund |
Comments: | Funding for two fiscal years only, plan to be delivered by end of fiscal year 08. |
Assessment Number: | 2007-235-00-ISRP-20060831 |
---|---|
Project: | 2007-235-00 - Blackfoot River Subbasin Plan |
Review: | FY07-09 Solicitation Review |
Completed Date: | 8/31/2006 |
Final Round ISRP Date: | None |
Final Round ISRP Rating: | Meets Scientific Review Criteria |
Final Round ISRP Comment: | |
The primary issue is policy related: does the Council need a subbasin plan for these areas? If they do, this is a fundable proposal and it is advisable to expand the plan to include the Clark Fork/Bitterroot Basins. A current proposal for the Bitterroot is not as well developed as this one. This is a good proposal for a subbasin plan, and they have the capability to create it: most of the work has already been done. The methods are appropriate and consistent with those used to develop earlier subbasin plans. The results should increase the effectiveness of future projects and provide a model of collaborative restoration.
This project will leverage existing work, at very reasonable cost with almost 50% cost share from existing partners. Further, this is not anticipated to be an unending obligation, just a 1-term project. It is not clear that the Tribes are as involved as they could be, but this is noted in the proposal. There is no stated relationship to other BPA projects, but the proposal relates to adjacent sub-basin plans as well as a number of efforts undertaken by partners using funds other than those from BPA. Planning objectives are clear, measurable and feasible in the time proposed. As the sponsors develop methods and strategies, they need to assure they are based on sound scientific evidence that they will, in fact, increase distribution and abundance of the target species. Human activity is believed to have caused a decline in this system's production of valuable fishes. Actions needed to restore lost productivity are difficult to identify because flushing flows, stable hillslopes, and flood plain dynamics no longer exist as they did in the past. Strategies for improving productivity in similar basins are not producing desired benefits for fish. Sponsors of this proposal need to be thoroughly familiar with all such strategies and develop innovative new ones with greater probabilities for success (e.g., see Palmer et al. 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 208-217). All exotic species should be assessed as potential threats to the natives. The monitoring and evaluation component is a major strength of this project, proposing to link a number of current and future efforts in the subbasin with a unique, integrated monitoring scheme. It seems highly likely that focal species and other associated species will benefit as projects come on-line that are carefully prioritized and planned and whose results are monitored. |
|
Documentation Links: |
|
Assessment Number: | 2007-235-00-INLIEU-20090521 |
---|---|
Project Number: | 2007-235-00 |
Review: | FY07-09 Solicitation Review |
Completed Date: | 10/6/2006 |
In Lieu Rating: | No Problems Exist |
Cost Share Rating: | None |
Comment: | (Because we funded development of other sub-basin plans). |
Assessment Number: | 2007-235-00-CAPITAL-20090618 |
---|---|
Project Number: | 2007-235-00 |
Review: | FY07-09 Solicitation Review |
Completed Date: | 2/27/2007 |
Capital Rating: | Does Not Qualify for Capital Funding |
Capital Asset Category: | None |
Comment: | None |
Name | Role | Organization |
---|---|---|
Jan Brady (Inactive) | Project Manager | Bonneville Power Administration |
Stan Bradshaw (Inactive) | Project Lead | Trout Unlimited (TU) |
Laura Ziemer | Supervisor | Trout Unlimited (TU) |
Paul Krueger (Inactive) | Supervisor | Bonneville Power Administration |