View and print project details including project summary, purpose, associations to Biological Opinions, and area. To learn more about any of the project properties, hold your mouse cursor over the field label.
Please Note: This project is the product of one or more merges and/or splits from other projects. Historical data automatically included here are limited to the current project and previous generation (the “parent” projects) only. The Project Relationships section details the nature of the relationships between this project and the previous generation. To learn about the complete ancestry of this project, please review the Project Relationships section on the Project Summary page of each parent project.
Province | Subbasin | % |
---|---|---|
Columbia Cascade | Entiat | 5.00% |
Methow | 15.00% | |
Wenatchee | 15.00% | |
Columbia Gorge | Big White Salmon | 5.00% |
Klickitat | 5.00% | |
Wind | 5.00% | |
Columbia Plateau | Yakima | 40.00% |
Mainstem | - | 10.00% |
Description: Page: 7 Figure 1: Map of the Yakama Nation Ceded Area and Reservation. Project(s): 2008-470-00 Document: P120281 Dimensions: 791 x 595 Description: Page: 17 Figure 2: Map of Klickitat Subbasin Study Area. Project(s): 2008-470-00 Document: P120281 Dimensions: 677 x 876 Description: Page: 22 Figure 3: Distribution of larval Pacific and Western brook lampreys in the Klickitat Subbasin 2009. Among the rivers surveyed, the highest sample site was at river kilometer 12 with 78 larvae (Figure 4). Project(s): 2008-470-00 Document: P120281 Dimensions: 1056 x 1491 Description: Page: 29 Figure 6: Rotary screw trap at river kilometer 4 on the Klickitat River. Project(s): 2008-470-00 Document: P120281 Dimensions: 876 x 655 Description: Page: 30 Figure 7: Klickitat River juvenile fish monitoring sites. Project(s): 2008-470-00 Document: P120281 Dimensions: 662 x 861 |
To view all expenditures for all fiscal years, click "Project Exp. by FY"
To see more detailed project budget information, please visit the "Project Budget" page
Acct FY | Acct Type | Amount | Fund | Budget Decision | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2024 | Expense | $553,096 | From: Fish Accord - LRT - Yakama | Yakama Tribe (YN) 2023-2025 Accord Extension | 09/30/2022 |
FY2024 | Expense | $45,032 | From: Fish Accord - LRT - Yakama | Accord Transfers (YN) 2/22/24 | 02/22/2024 |
FY2025 | Expense | $566,924 | From: Fish Accord - LRT - Yakama | Yakama Tribe (YN) 2023-2025 Accord Extension | 09/30/2022 |
Number | Contractor Name | Title | Status | Total Contracted Amount | Dates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
41800 SOW | Yakama Confederated Tribes | 200847000 EXP YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY | Closed | $165,329 | 3/1/2009 - 2/28/2010 |
46830 SOW | Yakama Confederated Tribes | 200847000 YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY | Closed | $291,356 | 3/1/2010 - 2/28/2011 |
52042 SOW | Yakama Confederated Tribes | 2008-470-00 EXP YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY | Closed | $311,128 | 3/1/2011 - 2/29/2012 |
57336 SOW | Yakama Confederated Tribes | 2008-470-00 EXP YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY | Closed | $309,974 | 3/1/2012 - 2/28/2013 |
56662 REL 14 SOW | Yakama Confederated Tribes | 200847000 EXP YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY | Closed | $250,049 | 3/1/2013 - 2/28/2014 |
BPA-008046 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Yakama Nation Ceded Lands Lamprey Eval | Active | $665 | 10/1/2013 - 9/30/2014 |
56662 REL 52 SOW | Yakama Confederated Tribes | 2008-470-00 EXP YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY | Closed | $266,497 | 3/1/2014 - 2/28/2015 |
BPA-008412 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Yakama Nation Ceded Lands Lamprey Eval | Active | $431 | 10/1/2014 - 9/30/2015 |
56662 REL 76 SOW | Yakama Confederated Tribes | 2008-470-00 EXP YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY | Closed | $315,645 | 3/1/2015 - 2/29/2016 |
BPA-008939 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Yakama Nation Ceded Lands Lamprey Eval | Active | $1,432 | 10/1/2015 - 9/30/2016 |
56065 REL 16 SOW | Pacific Northwest National Laboratory | 2008-470-00 EXP PNNL - YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY, PNNL ELECTROFISHING | Closed | $9,891 | 10/14/2015 - 9/30/2016 |
56662 REL 100 SOW | Yakama Confederated Tribes | 2008-470-00 EXP YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY | Closed | $283,377 | 3/1/2016 - 2/28/2017 |
BPA-009496 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Yakama Nation Ceded Lands Lamprey Eval | Active | $2,923 | 10/1/2016 - 9/30/2017 |
56662 REL 123 SOW | Yakama Confederated Tribes | 2008-470-00 EXP YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY | Closed | $302,363 | 3/1/2017 - 2/28/2018 |
BPA-010058 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Yakama Nation Ceded Lands Lamprey Eval | Active | $2,342 | 10/1/2017 - 9/30/2018 |
56662 REL 153 SOW | Yakama Confederated Tribes | 2008-470-00 EXP YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY | Closed | $302,185 | 3/1/2018 - 2/28/2019 |
BPA-010956 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Yakama Nation Ceded Lands Lamprey Eval | Active | $1,794 | 10/1/2018 - 9/30/2019 |
56662 REL 182 SOW | Yakama Confederated Tribes | 2008-470-00 EXP YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY | Closed | $351,107 | 3/1/2019 - 2/29/2020 |
BPA-011997 | Bonneville Power Administration | FY20 - Pit Tags | Active | $1,081 | 10/1/2019 - 9/30/2020 |
56662 REL 206 SOW | Yakama Confederated Tribes | 2008-470-00 EXP YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY | Issued | $569,545 | 3/1/2020 - 2/28/2021 |
BPA-012090 | Bonneville Power Administration | FY21 Pit Tags | Active | $815 | 10/1/2020 - 9/30/2021 |
56662 REL 229 SOW | Yakama Confederated Tribes | 2008-470-00 EXP YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY | Issued | $500,838 | 3/1/2021 - 2/28/2022 |
BPA-012877 | Bonneville Power Administration | FY22 PIT tags | Active | $1,680 | 10/1/2021 - 9/30/2022 |
56662 REL 253 SOW | Yakama Confederated Tribes | 2008-470-00 EXP YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY | Issued | $506,147 | 3/1/2022 - 2/28/2023 |
BPA-013380 | Bonneville Power Administration | FY23 PIT tags | Active | $3,360 | 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2023 |
56662 REL 276 SOW | Yakama Confederated Tribes | 2008-470-00 EXP YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY | Issued | $536,246 | 3/1/2023 - 2/29/2024 |
BPA-013956 | Bonneville Power Administration | FY24 PIT tags | Active | $1,680 | 10/1/2023 - 9/30/2024 |
56662 REL 305 SOW | Yakama Confederated Tribes | 2008-470-00 EXP YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY | Issued | $593,352 | 3/1/2024 - 2/28/2025 |
CR-374978 SOW | Yakama Confederated Tribes | 2008-470-00 EXP YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY | Pending | $566,924 | 3/1/2025 - 2/28/2026 |
Annual Progress Reports | |
---|---|
Expected (since FY2004): | 26 |
Completed: | 14 |
On time: | 14 |
Status Reports | |
---|---|
Completed: | 65 |
On time: | 21 |
Avg Days Late: | 9 |
Count of Contract Deliverables | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Earliest Contract | Subsequent Contracts | Title | Contractor | Earliest Start | Latest End | Latest Status | Accepted Reports | Complete | Green | Yellow | Red | Total | % Green and Complete | Canceled |
41800 | 46830, 52042, 57336, 56662 REL 14, 56662 REL 52, 56662 REL 76, 56662 REL 100, 56662 REL 123, 56662 REL 153, 56662 REL 182, 56662 REL 206, 56662 REL 229, 56662 REL 253, 56662 REL 276, 56662 REL 305, CR-374978 | 2008-470-00 EXP YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY | Yakama Confederated Tribes | 03/01/2009 | 02/28/2026 | Pending | 61 | 193 | 20 | 0 | 26 | 239 | 89.12% | 1 |
BPA-8046 | PIT Tags - Yakama Nation Ceded Lands Lamprey Eval | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2013 | 09/30/2014 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-8412 | PIT Tags - Yakama Nation Ceded Lands Lamprey Eval | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2014 | 09/30/2015 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-8939 | PIT Tags - Yakama Nation Ceded Lands Lamprey Eval | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2015 | 09/30/2016 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
56065 REL 16 | 2008-470-00 EXP PNNL - YAKAMA NATION LAMPREY, PNNL ELECTROFISHING | Pacific Northwest National Laboratory | 10/14/2015 | 09/30/2016 | Closed | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100.00% | 0 | |
BPA-9496 | PIT Tags - Yakama Nation Ceded Lands Lamprey Eval | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2016 | 09/30/2017 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-10058 | PIT Tags - Yakama Nation Ceded Lands Lamprey Eval | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2017 | 09/30/2018 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-10956 | PIT Tags - Yakama Nation Ceded Lands Lamprey Eval | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2018 | 09/30/2019 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-11997 | FY20 - Pit Tags | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2019 | 09/30/2020 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-12090 | FY21 Pit Tags | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2020 | 09/30/2021 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-12877 | FY22 PIT tags | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2021 | 09/30/2022 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-13380 | FY23 PIT tags | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2022 | 09/30/2023 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-13956 | FY24 PIT tags | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2023 | 09/30/2024 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Project Totals | 65 | 196 | 20 | 0 | 26 | 242 | 89.26% | 1 |
Assessment Number: | 2008-470-00-NPCC-20210312 |
---|---|
Project: | 2008-470-00 - Yakama Nation Ceded Lands Lamprey Evaluation and Restoration |
Review: | 2019-2021 Mainstem/Program Support |
Proposal: | NPCC19-2008-470-00 |
Proposal State: | Pending Council Recommendation |
Approved Date: | 8/25/2019 |
Recommendation: | Implement |
Comments: |
Sponsor to address ISRP qualifications in next annual report; Project to implement per August 2018 Council recommendation regarding the Pacific Lamprey Master Plan. Continue to participate in collaborative regional lamprey efforts including the Lamprey Technical Work group, Conservation Agreement and the Tribal Pacific Lamprey Restoration Plan. [Background: See https:/www.nwcouncil.org/fish-and-wildlife/fish-and-wildlife-program/project-reviews-and-recommendations/mainstem-review] |
Assessment Number: | 2008-470-00-ISRP-20190404 |
---|---|
Project: | 2008-470-00 - Yakama Nation Ceded Lands Lamprey Evaluation and Restoration |
Review: | 2019-2021 Mainstem/Program Support |
Proposal Number: | NPCC19-2008-470-00 |
Completed Date: | None |
First Round ISRP Date: | 4/4/2019 |
First Round ISRP Rating: | Meets Scientific Review Criteria (Qualified) |
First Round ISRP Comment: | |
Qualifications:The ISRP recommends that the proponents describe their responses to the ISRP's comments and suggestions below in their upcoming annual report covering FY 2019 accomplishments. 1. Include quantitative objectives that are clearly linked to deliverables with specified timelines. 2. Provide additional information about procedures for inferring the availability of suitable habitat and the average density of larval Pacific lamprey in tributaries. Estimating the overall availability of suitable habitat and the average density of larval Pacific lamprey would require a random (or stratified random) sampling design throughout accessible tributaries. It is not sufficiently clear how the individual 50-m electrofishing sites are chosen, or how the presence/absence data are used to determine accessible reaches. 3. Describe the adaptive management process (i.e., review cycles) by which decisions to alter course of the project are being made. 4. Develop a formal management plan to refine procedures for sharing methods and data. Comment:The proposal and the 2017 Annual Report provide good evidence of progress since 2008 toward achieving stated objectives. Indeed, the knowledge obtained and management actions instituted through this project are very impressive. It is time to summarize these accomplishments in a comprehensive report, perhaps a peer-reviewed monograph that demonstrates the progress made by the Yakama Nation. 1. Objectives, Significance to Regional Programs, and Technical BackgroundThis project is large and diverse. The proposal provides insight about the overall direction but does not clearly describe the specific research and management activities for the next few years. Objectives are mentioned frequently, but the proposal becomes confusing, partly because the objectives are diverse and evolving over time, and partly because objectives are not labeled and described consistently throughout the proposal. The four broad objectives in the objectives section (page 9) are not quantitative, although they do include some consideration of timelines. The Problem Statement section describes (on page 8 under "New Objectives (2018-2028)") 7 restoration activities, 8 RME activities, and 5 deliverables. The proposal does not explain how these activities and deliverables relate to the 12 deliverables listed in the Project Deliverables section (pages 62-65) or how the 12 deliverables address the 4 objectives (stating only "to be developed" on pages 66-67). The Problem Statement section also describes 8 original objectives for the period 2008 to 2018, which help to evaluate progress over that period, but these objectives do not correspond with 13 primary goals listed in the latest annual report (for 2017). The extensive discussion about objectives and deliverables suggests a lot of planning and diverse activity within the project, but the inconsistent framework obscures the proponent's strategy and complicates evaluation of progress. For completeness, the proposal should provide descriptions of the specific work tasks to be completed over the next four-year funding period (i.e., specific quantitative time bound objectives). For example, how many larval index sites will be surveyed annually? How many adults will be translocated annually into the Yakima, Methow, Wenatchee, and Entiat subbasins? How many public outreach presentations will occur annually? The proposal clearly explains why this project was initiated and how it addresses biological objectives identified in the Pacific Lamprey Restoration Initiative, as well as critical uncertainties identified in the Fish and Wildlife Program. This project will require annual funding and long-term continuity to achieve the diverse objectives. 2. Results and Adaptive ManagementThe proposal and latest annual report (for 2017) provide extensive summaries of activities and progress since 2008. These results contributed to the recent synthesis report (CRITFC 2017a) that was reviewed favorably by the ISRP (ISRP 2018-2). The project is on track and continues to generate new approaches and data necessary for assessing and improving the status of Pacific lamprey in the study area. The proponents are commended for their commitment to adaptive management. The Adaptive Management section of the proposal is nicely organized and includes many good examples of lessons learned and self-evaluation of progress to date. However, neither the proposal nor the 2017 Annual Report describes the actual process (i.e., review cycles) by which decisions to adjust course will be made. Developing more specific objectives and protocols to assess compliance and effectiveness will help in refining the adaptive management process. This project provides new knowledge on methodological issues and status and trends that are broadly applicable to Pacific lamprey populations throughout the Columbia Basin. The proposal indicates that the project is evolving steadily and creatively as information is gained, limiting factors are discovered, and new approaches for restoration are developed. Examples of results that will have broad utility include new tagging methods, hatchery methods to propagate juvenile larvae and macrophthalmia, and field keys to distinguish the larvae of Pacific lamprey, brook lamprey, and river lamprey. The annual reports provide an appropriately detailed discussion of objectives, methods, and results. In the Data Management section of the proposal (pages 58-59), the proponents acknowledge a continuing need for a formal management plan to refine procedures for sharing methods and data. This concern was raised by the ISRP in our 2009 review and has yet to be addressed. Project findings have been shared with regional partners, presented at regional and national meetings, and documented in at least 73 publicly accessible documents and annual reports, and numerous peer-reviewed publications. The reports cover many topics including juvenile surveys, adult collections and translocations, juvenile PIT tagging, juvenile entrainment, public outreach, and other topics related to the objectives and primary deliverables. A full evaluation of these reports is beyond the scope of this review, but a partial reading of a few reports indicates that they are well-written scientific documents. 3. Methods: Project Relationships, Work Types, and DeliverablesThe proposal provides a good overview of activities and methods, and the 2017 Annual Report provides sufficient detail for a rigorous review of methods. Both reports use the published literature to justify assertions and support procedures. Methods generally seem appropriate. An exception is the description of survey procedures for estimating the availability of suitable habitat and the density of larval Pacific lamprey. Estimating the overall availability of suitable habitat and average density would require a random (or stratified random) sampling design throughout accessible tributaries. It is not clear how the individual 50-m electrofishing sites are chosen or how the presence/absence data are used to determine accessible reaches. The larval Pacific lamprey surveys are intended to provide information on presence/absence at selected sites as well as average density by size category in Type 1 and 2 habitats within the selected sites. The methods should provide additional explanation of how the 50-m electrofishing sites were selected because that process will determine the statistical validity of inferences about density at larger spatial scales. With more sophisticated statistical analysis of density distributions from stratified random survey data, it might be possible to distinguish among three different factors that could limit the density of lamprey observed in a particular site and habitat type: (1) accessibility of the site to larval Pacific lamprey; (2) the number of larval Pacific lamprey that have access to the site (e.g., "seeding" level in the tributary); and (3) habitat preference by larval Pacific lamprey that are able to reach the site. Such an analysis could look for spatial and habitat correlates in deviations from the density distributions that would be expected under the null hypothesis of unrestricted access to sites and random occupation within sites. Some specific methods employed by the project have not yet been documented for PNAMP. The proposal summary states that an effort will be made to upload methods into PNAMP in the future. Most research objectives are stated as anticipated outcomes rather than explicit hypotheses. This project aims to serve a long-term monitoring and assessment function. The proposal and 2017 Annual Report together provide appropriate detail about the types of monitoring activities that have been conducted or planned. More detail regarding methods and outcomes for monitoring efforts can be gleaned from the array of documents and reports. |
|
Documentation Links: |
Assessment Number: | 2008-470-00-ISRP-20100323 |
---|---|
Project: | 2008-470-00 - Yakama Nation Ceded Lands Lamprey Evaluation and Restoration |
Review: | Fish Accord ISRP Review |
Completed Date: | None |
First Round ISRP Date: | 3/6/2009 |
First Round ISRP Rating: | Meets Scientific Review Criteria - In Part |
First Round ISRP Comment: | |
Work element/objective specific recommendations: • The work elements for Objectives 1, 2, 4, and 5 are scientifically supported. • For Objective 3 – document current status of larval Pacific lamprey with presence/absence surveys – the ISRP requests a response to the concerns raised about the survey design before implementation; this memo provides suggestions to be included in the final survey design. • Objective 6 – identification of “all known and potential” limiting factors – is a very large undertaking and should be described in greater detail, particularly with regard to the specific life history requirements of Pacific lamprey in the Yakima subbasin. Taking a full life-cycle approach, the major limiting factor may be either adult or ammocoete passage at mainstem Columbia River dams, so this really needs to be recognized and discussed more in Objective 6. The ISRP concludes that enough published data exist on this species to scope a more strategic approach before beginning the extensive field work proposed. • Objectives 7 and 8, which involve lamprey reintroductions and initiation of a supplementation program, can be phased in pending the outcome of the survey and limiting factor analysis. |
|
Documentation Links: |
|
Assessment Number: | 2008-470-00-NPCC-20110629 |
---|---|
Project: | 2008-470-00 - Yakama Nation Ceded Lands Lamprey Evaluation and Restoration |
Review: | RME / AP Category Review |
Proposal: | RMECAT-2008-470-00 |
Proposal State: | Pending BPA Response |
Approved Date: | 6/10/2011 |
Recommendation: | Fund (Qualified) |
Comments: | Implement with conditions through FY 2012 per April 14, 2010 Council decision. In addition, sponsor to address ISRP qualifications (ISRP 2010-44B) by assisting in the development of a synthesis report for ISRP review as described in programmatic issue #8. Implementation beyond FY 2012 based on ISRP and Council reviews of these follow-up actions. |
Conditions: | |
Council Condition #1 Programmatic Issue: RMECAT #8 Lamprey—. | |
Council Condition #2 The Council decision by the Council on April 14, 2009 - Based on the ISRP review (ISRP document 2009-9) the Council supports this project for implementation. This recommendation is conditioned on the understanding that the activities associated with the adult Pacific lamprey translocation program (objective 7) and the development of supplementation / artificial propagation (objective 8) are dependent on a future review by the ISRP and Council. |
Assessment Number: | 2008-470-00-BIOP-20101105 |
---|---|
Project Number: | 2008-470-00 |
Review: | RME / AP Category Review |
Proposal Number: | RMECAT-2008-470-00 |
Completed Date: | None |
2008 FCRPS BiOp Workgroup Rating: | Response Requested |
Comments: |
BiOp Workgroup Comments: Please identify: 1. Why your data is "not electronically available"; and 2. What data sets will not be "electronically available" for various deliverables. Please specify the deliverable that is not electronically available. (Note a data set includes the raw data collected and additional data on analysis). For example if there is a deliverable for population adult abundance or habitat, we expect your raw and synthesized data to be made available electronically. - Your response may help BPA identify funding needs for data repositories or identify an existing data warehouse that your data could be stored. The BiOp RM&E Workgroups made the following determinations regarding the proposal's ability or need to support BiOp Research, Monitoring and Evaluation (RME) RPAs. If you have questions regarding these RPA association conclusions, please contact your BPA COTR and they will help clarify, or they will arrange further discussion with the appropriate RM&E Workgroup Leads. BiOp RPA associations for the proposed work are: () All Questionable RPA Associations () and All Deleted RPA Associations () |
Proponent Response: | |
|
Project Relationships: |
This project Merged From 2008-450-00 effective on 11/20/2008 Relationship Description: FA-LRT-YAKAMA moveto 200847000 This project Merged From 2008-451-00 effective on 11/20/2008 Relationship Description: FA-LRT-YAKAMA moveto 200847000 This project Merged From 2008-452-00 effective on 11/20/2008 Relationship Description: FA-LRT-YAKAMA moveto 200847000 |
---|
Name | Role | Organization |
---|---|---|
Debbie Azure | Administrative Contact | Yakama Confederated Tribes |
Ralph Lampman | Project Lead | Yakama Confederated Tribes |
David Kaplowe | Supervisor | Bonneville Power Administration |
Edward Gresh | Env. Compliance Lead | Bonneville Power Administration |
Thomas Scribner | Supervisor | Yakama Confederated Tribes |
Tyler Beals | Technical Contact | Yakama Confederated Tribes |
Monica Clark | Administrative Contact | Yakama Confederated Tribes |
Jeanna Hernandez | Administrative Contact | Yakama Confederated Tribes |
Deborah Docherty (Inactive) | Interested Party | Bonneville Power Administration |
Jaren Wallulatum (Inactive) | Administrative Contact | Yakama Confederated Tribes |
James Barron | Project Manager | Bonneville Power Administration |