View and print project details including project summary, purpose, associations to Biological Opinions, and area. To learn more about any of the project properties, hold your mouse cursor over the field label.
Province | Subbasin | % |
---|---|---|
Blue Mountain | Grande Ronde | 100.00% |
|
Description: Page: 51 Figure 1: Locations of fish traps in the Grande Ronde River Subbasin during the study period. Shaded areas delineate spring Chinook salmon spawning and upper rearing areas in each study stream. Dashed lines indicate the Grande Ronde River and Wallowa River valleys. Project: 1992-026-04 Document: P122551 Dimensions: 942 x 966 |
To view all expenditures for all fiscal years, click "Project Exp. by FY"
To see more detailed project budget information, please visit the "Project Budget" page
Acct FY | Acct Type | Amount | Fund | Budget Decision | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2022 | Expense | $1,276,577 | From: BiOp FCRPS 2008 (non-Accord) | SOY Transfers Over $1M | 06/04/2021 |
FY2022 | Expense | $44,151 | From: BiOp FCRPS 2008 (non-Accord) | FY22 ODFW Adjustments -- 12/9/2021 | 12/09/2021 |
FY2023 | Expense | $1,320,728 | From: BiOp FCRPS 2008 (non-Accord) | FY23 SOY Budget Upload | 06/01/2022 |
FY2023 | Expense | $26,218 | From: BiOp FCRPS 2008 (non-Accord) | ODFW FY23 Adjustments | 08/26/2022 |
Number | Contractor Name | Title | Status | Total Contracted Amount | Dates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
225 REL 2
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 1992-026-04 EARLY LIFE HISTORY STUDY OF GRANDE RONDE RIVER BASIN | Terminated | $763,576 | 12/1/2000 - 11/30/2001 |
4119
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 1992-026-04 GRANDE RONDE CHINOOK SALMON EARLY LIFE | Closed | $2,935,522 | 3/23/2001 - 1/31/2005 |
21206
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | PI199202604 GRANDE RONDE CHINOOK SALMON EARLY LIFE HISTORY | Closed | $860,092 | 2/1/2005 - 1/31/2006 |
26380
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 199202604 EXP GRANDE RONDE CHINOOK SALMON EARLY LIFE HISTORY | Closed | $887,789 | 2/12/2006 - 1/31/2007 |
BPA-005598 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - GR Early Life History of Spg Chinook | Active | $24,025 | 10/1/2006 - 9/30/2007 |
31086
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 199202604 EXP GRANDE RONDE LIFE HISTORY M&E | Closed | $717,529 | 2/1/2007 - 1/31/2008 |
BPA-003709 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Life Studies Of Spring Chinook | Active | $24,704 | 10/1/2007 - 9/30/2008 |
36760
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 1992-026-04 EXP GRANDE RONDE LIFE HISTORY M&E | Closed | $661,513 | 2/1/2008 - 1/31/2009 |
BPA-004121 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Life Studies of Spring Chinook | Active | $23,102 | 10/1/2008 - 9/30/2009 |
41002
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 1992-026-04 EXP GRANDE RONDE CH EARLY LIFE HISTORY STUDY | Closed | $759,582 | 2/1/2009 - 1/31/2010 |
BPA-004982 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Life Studies of Spring Chinook | Active | $26,802 | 10/1/2009 - 9/30/2010 |
46139
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 199202604 EXP GRANDE RONDE CHINOOK EARLY LIFE HISTORY STUDY 2010 | Closed | $753,494 | 2/1/2010 - 1/31/2011 |
BPA-005704 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Life Studies of Spring Chinook | Active | $41,173 | 10/1/2010 - 9/30/2011 |
51891
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 199202604 EXP GRANDE RONDE CHINOOK EARLY LIFE HISTORY STUDY 2011 | Closed | $1,103,690 | 2/1/2011 - 1/31/2012 |
BPA-006345 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Life Studies of Spring Chinook | Active | $28,633 | 10/1/2011 - 9/30/2012 |
56105
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 199202604 EXP GRANDE RONDE CHINOOK EARLY LIFE HISTORY STUDY 2012 | Closed | $1,152,555 | 2/1/2012 - 1/31/2013 |
BPA-006992 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Life Studies of Spring Chinook | Active | $27,298 | 10/1/2012 - 9/30/2013 |
60987
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 1992-026-04 EXP GRANDE RONDE CH EARLY LIFE HISTORY STUDY 2013 | Closed | $1,199,899 | 2/1/2013 - 1/31/2014 |
BPA-007725 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Life Studies of Spring Chinook | Active | $27,056 | 10/1/2013 - 9/30/2014 |
64286
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 1992-026-04 EXP GRANDE RONDE CH EARLY LIFE HISTORY STUDY 2014 | Closed | $1,183,412 | 2/1/2014 - 1/31/2015 |
BPA-008382 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Life Studies of Spring Chinook 15 | Active | $14,939 | 10/1/2014 - 9/30/2015 |
68144
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 1992-026-04 EXP GRANDE RONDE CH EARLY LIFE HISTORY STUDY 2015 | Closed | $1,203,412 | 2/1/2015 - 1/31/2016 |
BPA-008900 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Life Studies Spring Chinook 16 | Active | $20,347 | 10/1/2015 - 9/30/2016 |
71578
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 1992-026-04 EXP GRANDE RONDE CH EARLY LIFE HISTORY STUDY 2016 | Closed | $1,196,908 | 2/1/2016 - 1/31/2017 |
BPA-009523 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Life Studies Spring Chinook - FY17 | Active | $23,367 | 10/1/2016 - 9/30/2017 |
75001
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 1992-026-04 EXP GRANDE RONDE CH EARLY LIFE HISTORY STUDY 2017 | Closed | $1,172,987 | 2/1/2017 - 1/31/2018 |
BPA-010150 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Life Studies Spring Chinook | Active | $20,911 | 10/1/2017 - 9/30/2018 |
74313 REL 22
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 1992-026-04 EXP GRANDE RONDE CH EARLY LIFE HISTORY STUDY | Closed | $1,190,023 | 2/1/2018 - 1/31/2019 |
BPA-010810 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Life Studies Spring Chinook | Active | $24,490 | 10/1/2018 - 9/30/2019 |
74313 REL 50
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 1992-026-04 EXP GRANDE RONDE CH EARLY LIFE HISTORY STUDY | Closed | $1,120,481 | 2/1/2019 - 1/31/2020 |
BPA-011699 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Life Studies Spring Chinook | Active | $32,954 | 10/1/2019 - 9/30/2020 |
74313 REL 72
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 1992-026-04 EXP GRANDE RONDE SALMONID LIFE CYCLE MONITORING | Closed | $1,227,015 | 2/1/2020 - 1/31/2021 |
BPA-012063 | Bonneville Power Administration | FY21 Pit Tags | Active | $32,892 | 10/1/2020 - 9/30/2021 |
74313 REL 91
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 1992-026-04 EXP GRANDE RONDE CH EARLY LIFE HISTORY STUDY | Issued | $1,328,029 | 2/1/2021 - 1/31/2022 |
BPA-012886 | Bonneville Power Administration | FY22 PIT tags | Active | $24,842 | 10/1/2021 - 9/30/2022 |
74313 REL 111
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 1992-026-04 EXP GRANDE RONDE CH EARLY LIFE HISTORY STUDY | Issued | $1,295,886 | 2/1/2022 - 1/31/2023 |
BPA-013271 | Bonneville Power Administration | FY23 PIT Tags | Active | $25,410 | 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2023 |
84041 REL 14
![]() |
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 1992-026-04 EXP GRANDE RONDE CH EARLY LIFE HISTORY STUDY | Issued | $1,313,636 | 2/1/2023 - 1/31/2024 |
Annual Progress Reports | |
---|---|
Expected (since FY2004): | 29 |
Completed: | 26 |
On time: | 24 |
Status Reports | |
---|---|
Completed: | 73 |
On time: | 52 |
Avg Days Late: | 0 |
Count of Contract Deliverables | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Earliest Contract | Subsequent Contracts | Title | Contractor | Earliest Start | Latest End | Latest Status | Accepted Reports | Complete | Green | Yellow | Red | Total | % Green and Complete | Canceled |
4119 | 21206, 26380, 31086, 36760, 41002, 46139, 51891, 56105, 60987, 64286, 68144, 71578, 75001, 74313 REL 22, 74313 REL 50, 74313 REL 72, 74313 REL 91, 74313 REL 111, 84041 REL 14 | 1992-026-04 EXP GRANDE RONDE CH EARLY LIFE HISTORY STUDY | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | 03/23/2001 | 01/31/2024 | Issued | 73 | 272 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 287 | 94.77% | 2 |
BPA-5598 | PIT Tags - GR Early Life History of Spg Chinook | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2006 | 09/30/2007 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-3709 | PIT Tags - Life Studies Of Spring Chinook | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2007 | 09/30/2008 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-4121 | PIT Tags - Life Studies of Spring Chinook | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2008 | 09/30/2009 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-4982 | PIT Tags - Life Studies of Spring Chinook | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2009 | 09/30/2010 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-5704 | PIT Tags - Life Studies of Spring Chinook | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2010 | 09/30/2011 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-6345 | PIT Tags - Life Studies of Spring Chinook | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2011 | 09/30/2012 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-6992 | PIT Tags - Life Studies of Spring Chinook | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2012 | 09/30/2013 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-7725 | PIT Tags - Life Studies of Spring Chinook | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2013 | 09/30/2014 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-8382 | PIT Tags - Life Studies of Spring Chinook 15 | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2014 | 09/30/2015 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-8900 | PIT Tags - Life Studies Spring Chinook 16 | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2015 | 09/30/2016 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-9523 | PIT Tags - Life Studies Spring Chinook - FY17 | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2016 | 09/30/2017 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-10150 | PIT Tags - Life Studies Spring Chinook | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2017 | 09/30/2018 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-10810 | PIT Tags - Life Studies Spring Chinook | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2018 | 09/30/2019 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-11699 | PIT Tags - Life Studies Spring Chinook | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2019 | 09/30/2020 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-12063 | FY21 Pit Tags | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2020 | 09/30/2021 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-12886 | FY22 PIT tags | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2021 | 09/30/2022 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
BPA-13271 | FY23 PIT Tags | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2022 | 09/30/2023 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Project Totals | 73 | 272 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 287 | 94.77% | 2 |
Assessment Number: | 1992-026-04-NPCC-20230310 |
---|---|
Project: | 1992-026-04 - Grande Ronde Salmonid Life Cycle Monitoring Project |
Review: | 2022 Anadromous Fish Habitat & Hatchery Review |
Approved Date: | 4/15/2022 |
Recommendation: | Implement with Conditions |
Comments: |
Response received on March 9th, 2022. Outyear implementation funding (FY2023) dependent upon Council decision. [Background: See https://www.nwcouncil.org/2021-2022-anadromous-habitat-and-hatchery-review/] |
Assessment Number: | 1992-026-04-NPCC-20101108 |
---|---|
Project: | 1992-026-04 - Grande Ronde Salmonid Life Cycle Monitoring Project |
Review: | RME / AP Category Review |
Proposal: | RMECAT-1992-026-04 |
Proposal State: | Pending BPA Response |
Approved Date: | 6/10/2011 |
Recommendation: | Fund (In Part) |
Comments: | Implement Objectives 1-4 only with condition through 2016: Implementation subject to regional hatchery effects evaluation process described in programmatic recommendation #4. |
Conditions: | |
Council Condition #1 Programmatic Issue: RMECAT #4 Hatchery Effectiveness—subject to regional hatchery effects evaluation process |
Assessment Number: | 1992-026-04-ISRP-20101015 |
---|---|
Project: | 1992-026-04 - Grande Ronde Salmonid Life Cycle Monitoring Project |
Review: | RME / AP Category Review |
Proposal Number: | RMECAT-1992-026-04 |
Completed Date: | 12/17/2010 |
Final Round ISRP Date: | 12/17/2010 |
Final Round ISRP Rating: | Meets Scientific Review Criteria - In Part (Qualified) |
Final Round ISRP Comment: | |
The project’s status and trend monitoring objectives (1-4) and the tasks involved meet scientific review criteria. In future proposals, however, the proponents need to provide a more thorough presentation of results for each project objective, adding interpretive discussion of data. This is especially true for the supplementation part of the project.
Qualification: Project objectives 5 and 6, concerning the Intensively Monitored Watershed (IMW) procedure and habitat monitoring do not meet scientific review criteria. The proponents should prepare a comprehensive plan for the IMW project including its objectives, study design, metrics, and the project’s role in the IMW project. The ISRP should review the plan before its implementation. Objectives 5 and 6 are not scientifically justifiable at this time due to the lack of specific detail concerning the Grand Ronde IMW program and this project’s role in that program. In the proposal, broad objectives of the IMW program and ISEMP procedures and protocols are given, but little detail is provided about on-the-ground studies in the Grande Ronde basin. What are the specific objectives of the Grande Ronde? What is the study design? What hypotheses will be tested? What are the treatment and reference streams, why were they selected, and what are the restoration activities that are ongoing and planned in them? At what spatial scales will comparisons be made? What metrics will be chosen? What is this project’s role? Will the proponents integrate and analyze the data (as implied by the objectives), and how will the data be analyzed? If other projects are involved, what is their role? In short, a great deal more information about the IMW specific to the Grande Ronde and this project needs to be provided before scientific criteria are met. In connection with this, the ISRP recommends that the project obtain the services of a qualified biometrician to help with statistical design of the monitoring and of the subsequent data analyses. All of these questions should be addressed in a comprehensive plan for the IMW which should be reviewed by the ISRP before implementation. The proponents revealed in oral presentation that they plan to add staff - a project leader for the EMAP (status and trend) and for the IMW. Their IMW will focus on the Grande Ronde above the Wallowa River. The project’s control stream for adult escapement, the Minam River is in wilderness area and is hard to access. The Lower Grande Ronde is also difficult to access in springtime. How will these factors affect accomplishment of the project objectives? This major project, ongoing since 1994, seems to have substantial accomplishments, but this was not evident from the results presented in the proposal. There were tables and graphs on timing of movements of juvenile steelhead and Chinook and on smolts per redd for spring Chinook, but the proponents presented little explanation and interpretation of the data. They often stated what they did, and then referred the reviewer to a table or graph with little interpretation of what those results mean, no general conclusions being drawn. Also, it would have been helpful for the proponents to present tables in more concise and understandable form. The oral presentation provided interpretation that alleviated some of the interpretive deficiency. The ISRP requests that future proposals contain narrative interpretation and discussion of the project’s data. The results need to be summarized by project objective to clearly illustrate that the project is progressing toward accomplishing the objectives. For each of the project’s four streams, information on spawner abundance and distribution, smolt abundance, smolts-per-spawner, smolt survival, life history characteristics (age, size, timing of migration), and juvenile abundance and distribution for both steelhead and salmon should have been provided, and then the meaning of this information should have been discussed. Most importantly, the proponents should have discussed far more fully the supplementation evaluation, including study design, metrics, data analysis including statistical analyses, and results to date. Then, based on the results, the proponents should offer their assessment of the success of the supplementation program thus far. |
|
First Round ISRP Date: | 10/18/2010 |
First Round ISRP Rating: | Meets Scientific Review Criteria - In Part (Qualified) |
First Round ISRP Comment: | |
The project’s status and trend monitoring objectives (1-4) and the tasks involved meet scientific review criteria. In future proposals, however, the proponents need to provide a more thorough presentation of results for each project objective, adding interpretive discussion of data. This is especially true for the supplementation part of the project. Qualification: Project objectives 5 and 6, concerning the Intensively Monitored Watershed (IMW) procedure and habitat monitoring do not meet scientific review criteria. The proponents should prepare a comprehensive plan for the IMW project including its objectives, study design, metrics, and the project’s role in the IMW project. The ISRP should review the plan before its implementation. Objectives 5 and 6 are not scientifically justifiable at this time due to the lack of specific detail concerning the Grand Ronde IMW program and this project’s role in that program. In the proposal, broad objectives of the IMW program and ISEMP procedures and protocols are given, but little detail is provided about on-the-ground studies in the Grande Ronde basin. What are the specific objectives of the Grande Ronde? What is the study design? What hypotheses will be tested? What are the treatment and reference streams, why were they selected, and what are the restoration activities that are ongoing and planned in them? At what spatial scales will comparisons be made? What metrics will be chosen? What is this project’s role? Will the proponents integrate and analyze the data (as implied by the objectives), and how will the data be analyzed? If other projects are involved, what is their role? In short, a great deal more information about the IMW specific to the Grande Ronde and this project needs to be provided before scientific criteria are met. In connection with this, the ISRP recommends that the project obtain the services of a qualified biometrician to help with statistical design of the monitoring and of the subsequent data analyses. All of these questions should be addressed in a comprehensive plan for the IMW which should be reviewed by the ISRP before implementation. The proponents revealed in oral presentation that they plan to add staff - a project leader for the EMAP (status and trend) and for the IMW. Their IMW will focus on the Grande Ronde above the Wallowa River. The project’s control stream for adult escapement, the Minam River is in wilderness area and is hard to access. The Lower Grande Ronde is also difficult to access in springtime. How will these factors affect accomplishment of the project objectives? This major project, ongoing since 1994, seems to have substantial accomplishments, but this was not evident from the results presented in the proposal. There were tables and graphs on timing of movements of juvenile steelhead and Chinook and on smolts per redd for spring Chinook, but the proponents presented little explanation and interpretation of the data. They often stated what they did, and then referred the reviewer to a table or graph with little interpretation of what those results mean, no general conclusions being drawn. Also, it would have been helpful for the proponents to present tables in more concise and understandable form. The oral presentation provided interpretation that alleviated some of the interpretive deficiency. The ISRP requests that future proposals contain narrative interpretation and discussion of the project’s data. The results need to be summarized by project objective to clearly illustrate that the project is progressing toward accomplishing the objectives. For each of the project’s four streams, information on spawner abundance and distribution, smolt abundance, smolts-per-spawner, smolt survival, life history characteristics (age, size, timing of migration), and juvenile abundance and distribution for both steelhead and salmon should have been provided, and then the meaning of this information should have been discussed. Most importantly, the proponents should have discussed far more fully the supplementation evaluation, including study design, metrics, data analysis including statistical analyses, and results to date. Then, based on the results, the proponents should offer their assessment of the success of the supplementation program thus far. |
|
Documentation Links: |
|
Assessment Number: | 1992-026-04-BIOP-20101105 |
---|---|
Project Number: | 1992-026-04 |
Review: | RME / AP Category Review |
Proposal Number: | RMECAT-1992-026-04 |
Completed Date: | None |
2008 FCRPS BiOp Workgroup Rating: | Response Requested |
Comments: |
BiOp Workgroup Comments: BPA would like to discuss further coordination in data management needs of this project to support RPA 72 and potentital coordination with PNAMP Data workgroup. The F&W Program would like to meet with ODFW, CRITFC and Umatilla staff to ensure there is no duplication of effort. Multiple entites are producing survial estimates, conducting snorkle and redd surveys, using smolt traps, and assessing habitat in various ways. We will request a time to meet before January to clarify the level of effort in the Grande Ronde. Please identify: 1. Why your data is "not electronically available"; and 2. What data sets will not be "electronically available" for various deliverables. Please specify the deliverable that is not electronically available. (Note a data set includes the raw data collected and additional data on analysis). For example if there is a deliverable for population adult abundance or habitat, we expect your raw and synthesized data to be made available electronically. - Your response may help BPA identify funding needs for data repositories or identify an existing data warehouse that your data could be stored. The BiOp RM&E Workgroups made the following determinations regarding the proposal's ability or need to support BiOp Research, Monitoring and Evaluation (RME) RPAs only. If you have questions regarding these RPA association conclusions, please contact your BPA COTR and they will help clarify, or they will arrange further discussion with the appropriate RM&E Workgroup Leads. BiOp RPA associations for the proposed work are: (50.6 56.3 63.1 64.1 64.2 ) All Questionable RPA Associations (72.1) and All Deleted RPA Associations ( 56.1 56.2 63.2 ) |
Proponent Response: | |
1. Why your data is "not electronically available" Response: Our data could be electronically available. Tell us where you want it uploaded to be available. 2. What data sets will not be "electronically available" for various deliverables. Please specify the deliverable that is not electronically available. (Note a data set includes the raw data collected and additional data on analysis). For example if there is a deliverable for population adult abundance or habitat, we expect your raw and synthesized data to be made available electronically. Response: All data sets could be electronically available. Where is an appropriate data repository?
|
Assessment Number: | 1992-026-04-NPCC-20090924 |
---|---|
Project: | 1992-026-04 - Grande Ronde Salmonid Life Cycle Monitoring Project |
Review: | FY07-09 Solicitation Review |
Approved Date: | 10/23/2006 |
Recommendation: | Fund |
Comments: |
Assessment Number: | 1992-026-04-ISRP-20060831 |
---|---|
Project: | 1992-026-04 - Grande Ronde Salmonid Life Cycle Monitoring Project |
Review: | FY07-09 Solicitation Review |
Completed Date: | 8/31/2006 |
Final Round ISRP Date: | None |
Final Round ISRP Rating: | Meets Scientific Review Criteria |
Final Round ISRP Comment: | |
This proposal is for ongoing studies focused on the early life stages of naturally and hatchery-produced spring Chinook salmon and summer steelhead in the Grande Ronde River system. The proposal is clearly written and very detailed. The statements of the project relationship to regional management questions are especially helpful in clarifying the project purpose.
The thorough project history indicates that studies of habitat conditions have been done which should meet the ISRP concerns expressed in the previous review cycle. The ISRP expects that the project will be able to examine for possible relation of egg-to-smolt survival to those conditions. Results from this project have been used in recommendations for protection and enhancement of Grande Ronde subbasin spring Chinook salmon populations and their rearing habitats. The project has a long history of effective population monitoring and habitat analysis. However, it is unclear how the results will be evaluated. For future proposals it would be helpful to state performance measures and indications of how success will be determined. Additionally, it is not clear if or when study effort could be reduced because the needs for additional information decline. The ISRP encourages the sponsors to share successes and lessons learned to others in and out of the region via professional publications. |
|
Documentation Links: |
|
Assessment Number: | 1992-026-04-INLIEU-20090521 |
---|---|
Project Number: | 1992-026-04 |
Review: | FY07-09 Solicitation Review |
Completed Date: | 10/6/2006 |
In Lieu Rating: | Problems Exist |
Cost Share Rating: | None |
Comment: | M&E for chinook populations; fishery managers authorized/required to perform as well; need cost share or other remedy. |
Assessment Number: | 1992-026-04-CAPITAL-20090618 |
---|---|
Project Number: | 1992-026-04 |
Review: | FY07-09 Solicitation Review |
Completed Date: | 2/27/2007 |
Capital Rating: | Does Not Qualify for Capital Funding |
Capital Asset Category: | None |
Comment: | None |
Name | Role | Organization |
---|---|---|
Russell Scranton | Project Manager | Bonneville Power Administration |
Russell Scranton | Project SME | Bonneville Power Administration |
Kristina Eilts | Env. Compliance Lead | Bonneville Power Administration |
Polly Gibson | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife | |
Ian Tattam | Supervisor | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife |
Joseph Lemanski | Project Lead | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife |