Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program
RSS Feed for updates to Project 1997-024-00 - Avian Predation on Juvenile Salmonids Follow this via RSS feed. Help setting up RSS feeds?

Project Summary

Project 1997-024-00 - Avian Predation on Juvenile Salmonids
Project Number:
1997-024-00
Title:
Avian Predation on Juvenile Salmonids
Summary:
A study was initiated in 1997 to investigate the impacts of piscivorous colonial waterbirds on the survival of juvenile salmonids ( Oncorhynchus spp.) in the lower Columbia River (Roby et al. 1998; Collis et al. 2002). The study area included the Columbia River from the mouth (river km 0) to the head of the impoundment created by McNary Dam (river km 553). The species of piscivorous waterbirds investigated were California gulls (Larus californicus), ring-billed gulls (L.delawarensis), glaucous-winged/western gulls (L. glaucescens X L. occidentalis), Caspian terns (Sterna caspia), double-crested cormorants (Phalacrocorax auritus), and, more recently, American white pelicans (Pelecanus erythrorhynchos) and California brown pelicans (Pelecanus occidentalis californicus).
Proposer:
None
Proponent Orgs:
Oregon State University (Edu)
Real Time Research (Private)
Starting FY:
1997
Ending FY:
2019
BPA PM:
Stage:
Implementation - Project Status Report
Area:
Province Subbasin %
Basinwide - 100.00%
Purpose:
Predation
Emphasis:
RM and E
Focal Species:
All Anadromous Fish
All Anadromous Salmonids
Chinook - All Populations
Coho - Lower Columbia River ESU
Coho - Unspecified Population
Lamprey, Pacific
Sockeye - All Populations
Steelhead - All Populations
Wildlife
Species Benefit:
Anadromous: 100.0%   Resident: 0.0%   Wildlife: 0.0%
Special:
None

Study area in the Columbia River basin and coastal Washington showing the locations of active and former breeding colonies of piscivorous colonial waterbirds mentioned in this report.

Figure Name: Map 1

Document ID: P124726

Document: Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation of Avian Predation on Salmonid Smolts in the Lower and Mid-Columbia River

Page Number: 85

Project: 1997-024-00

Contract: 36864

Locations of existing recently-built and proposed islands designated for Caspian tern nesting as part of the federal agencies’ Caspian Tern Management Plan for the Columbia River estuary (USFWS 2005, 2006).

Figure Name: Map 2

Document ID: P124726

Document: Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation of Avian Predation on Salmonid Smolts in the Lower and Mid-Columbia River

Page Number: 86

Project: 1997-024-00

Contract: 36864

Study area in interior Oregon and northeastern California and locations of piscivorous waterbird colonies mentioned in this report.

Figure Name: Map 3

Document ID: P124726

Document: Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation of Avian Predation on Salmonid Smolts in the Lower and Mid-Columbia River

Page Number: 87

Project: 1997-024-00

Contract: 36864

Map of San Francisco Bay, California. Brooks Island is located in central San Francisco Bay, with the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers entering the Bay from the northeast. Eden Landing and Steven’s Creek are located in southern San Francisco Bay.

Figure Name: Figure A.1

Document ID: P124726

Document: Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation of Avian Predation on Salmonid Smolts in the Lower and Mid-Columbia River

Page Number: 159

Project: 1997-024-00

Contract: 36864


Summary of Budgets

To view all expenditures for all fiscal years, click "Project Exp. by FY"

Expense SOY Budget Working Budget Contracted Amount Modified Contract Amount Expenditures *
FY2018 (Previous) $535,341 $535,341 $0 $535,341 $524,027

BiOp FCRPS 2008 (non-Accord) $535,341 $0 $535,341 $524,027
FY2019 (Current) $535,341 $535,341 $0 $0 $29,473

BiOp FCRPS 2008 (non-Accord) $535,341 $0 $0 $29,473
FY2020 (Next) $0 $0 $0 $0

* Expenditures data includes accruals and are based on data through 30-Nov-2018

Decided Budget Transfers  (FY2018 - FY2020)

Acct FY Acct Type Amount Fund Budget Decision Date
FY2018 Expense $535,341 From: BiOp FCRPS 2008 (non-Accord) FY18 SOY Budgets 07/17/2017
FY2019 Expense $535,341 From: BiOp FCRPS 2008 (non-Accord) Q2 FY19 Flat Budgets 09/07/2018

Pending Budget Decision?  No


Actual Project Cost Share

Current Fiscal Year — 2019
Cost Share Partner Total Proposed Contribution Total Confirmed Contribution
There are no project cost share contributions to show.
Previous Fiscal Years
Fiscal Year Total Contributions % of Budget
2016 (Draft)
2015 $2,100,430 80 %
2014 $2,573,375 83 %
2013 $2,398,758 82 %
2012 $2,188,797 80 %
2011 $2,166,022 80 %
2010 $1,934,619 (Draft) 79 % (Draft)
2009 $6,403,250 92 %
2008 $2,538,944 83 %
2007 $425,466 46 %

Contracts

The table below contains contracts with the following statuses: Active, Complete, History, Issued.
Expense Contracts:
Number Contractor Name Title Status Contracted Amount Dates
325 REL 7 SOW WRITER-EDITOR SERVICES FOR EA, AVIAN PREDATION ON JUVENILE SALMON History $2,112 1/23/2001 - 6/30/2001
4275 SOW Oregon State University 1997-024-00 AVIAN PREDATION ON JUVINILE SALMONIDS History $1,296,080 4/2/2001 - 9/30/2003
12825 SOW Oregon State University 1997-024-00 AVIAN PREDATION ON JUVENILE SALMONIDS History $895,657 2/15/2003 - 1/31/2005
22182 SOW Oregon State University 1997-024-00 AVIAN PREDATION ON JUVENILE SALMONIDS History $219,991 4/1/2005 - 1/31/2006
26707 SOW Oregon State University 1997-024-00 EXP AVIAN PREDATION ON JUVENILE SALMONIDS History $460,367 3/13/2006 - 2/28/2007
BPA-005543 Bonneville Power Administration TBL Task Order Active $27,263 10/1/2006 - 9/30/2007
31313 SOW Oregon State University 1997-024-00 EXP AVIAN PREDATION ON JUVENILE SALMONIDS History $479,086 2/1/2007 - 1/31/2008
BPA-005544 Bonneville Power Administration TBL Task Order Active $21,136 10/1/2007 - 9/30/2008
BPA-005545 Bonneville Power Administration TBL Task Order Active $32,590 10/1/2008 - 9/30/2009
BPA-005038 Bonneville Power Administration FY10 Avian Pedation Photogrammetry Active $0 10/1/2009 - 9/30/2010
BPA-005452 Bonneville Power Administration BPA Photogrammetry for FY11 Avian Predation Active $29,208 10/1/2010 - 9/30/2011
60846 SOW Oregon State University 1997-024-00 EXP AVIAN PREDATION ON JUVENILE SALMON Issued $3,212,046 2/1/2013 - 1/31/2019



Annual Progress Reports
Expected (since FY2004):15
Completed:14
On time:14
Status Reports
Completed:54
On time:34
Avg Days Late:46

Earliest Subsequent           Accepted Count of Contract Deliverables
Contract Contract(s) Title Contractor Start End Status Reports Complete Green Yellow Red Total % Green and Complete Canceled
4275 12825, 22182, 26707, 31313, 36864, 56884, 60846 1997-024-00 AVIAN PREDATION ON JUVINILE SALMONIDS Oregon State University 04/2001 04/2001 Issued 54 112 8 0 3 123 97.56% 0
BPA-005543 TBL Task Order Bonneville Power Administration 10/2006 10/2006 Active 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BPA-005544 TBL Task Order Bonneville Power Administration 10/2007 10/2007 Active 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BPA-005545 TBL Task Order Bonneville Power Administration 10/2008 10/2008 Active 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BPA-005038 FY10 Avian Pedation Photogrammetry Bonneville Power Administration 10/2009 10/2009 Active 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BPA-005452 BPA Photogrammetry for FY11 Avian Predation Bonneville Power Administration 10/2010 10/2010 Active 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Totals 54 112 8 0 3 123 97.56% 0


The table content is updated frequently and thus contains more recent information than what was in the original proposal reviewed by ISRP and Council.

Review: 2018 Research Project Status Review

Independent Scientific Review Panel Assessment

Assessment Number: 1997-024-00-ISRP-20181109
Project: 1997-024-00 - Avian Predation on Juvenile Salmonids
Review: 2018 Research Project Status Review
Completed Date: 11/9/2018
Final Round ISRP Date: 9/28/2018
Final Round ISRP Rating: Meets Scientific Review Criteria (Qualified)
Final Round ISRP Comment:

1. Objectives

This project has been a successful collaboration between universities, federal researchers, and environmental consultants. The 2018 research narrative includes general goals for the management of avian predation rather than specific, measurable objectives with time-based milestones for the research to be conducted. Hypotheses associated with the research were not stated in the summary. The numerous peer-reviewed publications do state clear objectives and hypotheses. The unstated objectives are probably quantifiable and testable based on the mortality attributable to avian predators.

Project results have been very relevant to the Program and have benefited fish (i.e., decreased mortality) but have probably had a negative effect on wildlife (i.e., reduced nesting of avian predators). The proponents indicate that funding is being reduced, and they believe that additional time is needed to address ongoing questions associated with the movement of avian predators and the emergence of additional species of avian predators. They do not, however, indicate specific actions, time frames, or end-dates for the additional work.

2. Methods

Based on the results and the numerous peer-reviewed publications, the methods are scientifically sound. It is relatively easy to measure changes in bird numbers (e.g., colony size) or redistribution of birds, but it was unclear how this was linked to changes in total predation. A linkage between the two should be addressed. The proponents discuss the need to determine whether the avian-based mortality of emigrating salmonids is additive or compensatory, but they do not describe how they would do such a study.

3. Results

Although the project summary does not include quantifiable objectives, the proponents have been successful in providing information to address critical uncertainties (CUs) in the Predation theme.

One concern with results is the plots of predation-rate versus colony-size (Figure 1, Research Narrative). It is difficult to discern or compare the functional relationships between predation rate and colony size in these plots because the x-axes do not start at zero pairs of breeding birds and the y-axes are scaled differently in each plot. The implicit assumption that the relationship is linear (i.e., shown by the dashed lines fitted to the data) is likely unrealistic, at least for Middle Columbia steelhead where the y-intercept appears to be positive, implying avian predation occurs in the absence of birds. It seems more reasonable to fit non-linear curves that pass through the origin. The shape of that curve—called the “functional response to predator density”—and particularly whether the curve is concave up or down has important consequences for modeling the dynamics of predation. The authors should consider presenting estimates of biomass or number of fish eaten by birds rather than showing predation as a fraction of the run.

As a result of this project, three avian predation management plans have been developed and managers have taken steps which have initially reduced mortality of emigrating salmonids to avian predation in the estuary. Reporting is generally excellent and includes many peerreviewed publications. The latest annual report available through PISCES describes detailed results for 2016 and updates long-term time series and provides retrospective evaluations of the whole project. Collaboration and sharing of information among partners appear to be excellent. Despite these successes, many CUs remain, and recent developments suggest that predation impacts from piscivorous colonial waterbirds in the Columbia River Basin may be increasing at a time when funding for avian predation RM&E in the Basin is either being eliminated (USACE) or sharply reduced (BPA).

Rates of predation determined in this study are very site specific, but the study area is broad, including the Columbia River from the mouth (i.e., river km 0) to the head of the impoundment created by McNary Dam (i.e., river km 553). The project also monitors a variety of other piscivorous birds. Recent findings suggest that smolt predation rates by gulls nesting at some colonies in the Columbia Plateau region are comparable to, if not higher than, those of Caspian terns and double-crested cormorants nesting at colonies in the Columbia Plateau region. Summary project data are available at the project website (www.birdresearchnw.org/), and it appears that the raw data are available—perhaps on request.

4. 2017 Research Plan uncertainties validation

Agree. This project addresses CUs in the Predation theme (The list of uncertainties on the 2018 Review database (https://research.nwcouncil.org/2017/Projects) does not include the questions posed in the Research Plan “Critical uncertainties by theme: Predation”).

Qualification #1 - Quantifiable Objectives
Specific quantifiable objectives with time-based milestones should be developed to examine additive and compensatory density dependence predation effects. As part of this, the proponents should consider how their work fits in with ecosystem effects of predation. For example, these questions below among others should be addressed: • What is the timing of predation and who are the key bird, fish and mammal predators and prey? • How significant is predation in the lower river, estuary, and ocean plume? • What is the role of prey fish abundance in buffering juvenile salmonids from fish predators? • Where in the salmonid or predator life cycle is management intervention warranted?
Documentation Links:
Review: RME / AP Category Review

Council Recommendation

Assessment Number: 1997-024-00-NPCC-20110125
Project: 1997-024-00 - Avian Predation on Juvenile Salmonids
Review: RME / AP Category Review
Proposal: RMECAT-1997-024-00
Proposal State: Pending BPA Response
Approved Date: 6/10/2011
Recommendation: Fund
Comments: Implement through FY 2016.
Conditions:
Council Condition #1 Programmatic Issue: RMECAT #6 Research projects in general—.

Independent Scientific Review Panel Assessment

Assessment Number: 1997-024-00-ISRP-20101015
Project: 1997-024-00 - Avian Predation on Juvenile Salmonids
Review: RME / AP Category Review
Proposal Number: RMECAT-1997-024-00
Completed Date: 12/17/2010
Final Round ISRP Date: 12/17/2010
Final Round ISRP Rating: Meets Scientific Review Criteria
Final Round ISRP Comment:
This is a well developed, well designed and important program for the Fish and Wildlife Program that supports a clear need that will benefit salmonids in the Columbia River Basin. The investigators have demonstrated that avian predation concentrated in certain specific areas has a large effect on salmonid outmigrant survival. They developed the necessary data to show this need and to support the management plans to move nesting birds and reduce the predation. The work proposed will continue these efforts, support efforts to move cormorants to appropriate nesting locations, and continue to determine the importance of predation by other nesting waterbirds (including the relatively recent arrival of pelicans in the estuary). This study is important to understanding the predation rate of fish-eating birds on various salmon stocks. This rate is being evaluated in considerable detail; however, the predator influence on the overall survival rate of the various stocks seems unknown (is it mostly compensated for or is it additive)? For a true cost-benefit analysis, this question needs to be answered. Perhaps avian biologists working with salmon biologists can address this critical issue by working together on salmon life stage models for various stocks, especially since predation rates seem to vary among species and stocks.

1. Purpose, Significance to Regional Programs, Technical Background, and Objectives

Evaluate efficacy and management initiative implemented to reduce predation on juvenile salmonids by Caspian terns and double-crested cormorants on East Sand Island and develop plans for long-term management of avian predation, as warranted. Data indicates that most significant impacts to smolt survival occur in Columbia River estuary, although populations at other sites may be a concern to local stocks. The two avian species now take 15-20 million smolts annually, i.e., ~15% of all smolts. Stocks affected include every ESA-listed stock from throughout the Basin.

The project’s plan is to (1) evaluate efficacy of management initiative implemented to reduce tern predation on East Sand Island, (2) collect compile and analyze data needed for NEPA analyses required to manage cormorants on East Sand Island, and once implemented evaluate efficacy of management actions, and (3) investigate impacts on juvenile salmonids of other piscivorous birds (Brown Pelicans, White Pelicans, Brandt’s Cormorants and gull species), including interactions with smolt losses from Caspian Terns and Double-crested Cormorants. Specifically, assess changes in tern habitat use, colony size, productivity, diet composition, smolt consumption and stock-specific predation rates (associated with reducing the acreage for nesting on East Sand Island from 5 to 1.5 acres. Basically the same approach seems to be followed with cormorants, but it is still in early stages and has not progressed as far.

Nice background information is given, with many detailed publications. Tern population is relatively stable since 1998, but cormorant populations more than doubled. More salmonids are now eaten by cormorants than terns. However, similar to other predator control projects, there is the lingering concern of the importance of predation losses via birds relative to overarching factors such as ocean survival.

2. History: Accomplishments, Results, and Adaptive Management

Systemwide losses of juvenile salmonids to Caspian Terns in estuary amount to 3.6-6.7 million smolts per year, even after management to date. The colony on Rice Island was moved to E. Sand Island (closer to ocean) where diet would hopefully include fewer salmonids. A Caspian Tern dietary change indeed took place (from 90% salmonids to 47% salmonids) with a 62% reduction in consumption of smolts. Further management was needed with the goal in 2006 to redistribute half to two-thirds of E. Sand Island tern colony to alternative sites in Oregon and California, with goal to reduce smolt loss another 50% while still maintaining a viable tern population. Eight artificial islands were constructed in Oregon and California as alternative tern nesting habitat with more nesting islands planned as the size of the nesting area on E. Sand Island is reduced from 5 to 1.5 acres. Double-crested Cormorants on E. Sand Island in 2009 consumed 11.1 million smolts and the colony now represents 41% of the population in western North America. As with the tern, any management of the cormorants will likely require an analysis under NEPA which includes (1) assessment of population status in Pacific states, (2)available suitable alternative nesting habitat outside Columbia Basin, and (3) potential enhancement of salmonid recovery rates in Columbia River should management of cormorants be implemented. The project shows a history of solving problems with fish-eating birds and seems to be planning far ahead to obtain the information needed to assess responses from current or planned management activities. Many results have been published in peer reviewed journals. Raw data have been archived and are available to others. Adaptive Management is clearly demonstrated.

3. Project Relationships, Emerging Limiting Factors, and Tailored Questions for Type of Work (Hatchery, RME, Tagging)

Research, monitoring and evaluation of piscivorous waterbird colonies are paramount to success of several regional fish and wildlife recovery plans. Numbers and percentages of smolts consumed by avian predators are needed to assess the success of management activities. Furthermore, the investigators plan to evaluate whether reduction in smolt consumption associated with management of birds in the estuary is compensated by commensurate increases in predation by other avian populations. The diet data will provide information on impacts of avian predation to salmonid and non-salmonid species alike. The study is designed to broaden knowledge of fish mortality through understanding predator-prey interactions (on a species and stock basis). The study is dependent upon PIT tags applied by many salmon researchers. This indicates that avian biologists are working with salmon biologists.

A big question that does not seem to be fully discussed is, “What influence has the smolt loss from avian predation had on the adult return rate (survival) of various salmon stocks?” Some scenarios were discussed, but from what was presented, these seemed to be “what if” type presentations. The time is now to ask the question, “What type of data are necessary to fully understand what percentage of this avian predation loss is additive vs. compensatory?” It would seem like a real cost-benefit analysis needs the answer to this question. Game bird and waterfowl management has been concerned about compensatory and additive mortality for decades when determining harvest rates by hunting, so perhaps some approaches can be found in that literature. Emerging factors, especially climate change as it affects bird distribution, are acknowledged and factored into study designs. The investigators are apparently working with various management agencies across a broad geographic scope.

4. Deliverables, Work Elements, Metrics, and Methods

Fourteen deliverables were described and were very specific with respect to types of data being collected and types of reports that will be prepared (usually journal articles). The techniques were described, and most were standard techniques or techniques they developed and described in earlier years of this study. A few methods were slightly modified when changes needed to be made for a different species. The deliverables were listed for both Caspian terns and double-crested cormorants. Certainly the investigators planned far ahead, e.g., collecting pre-management activity data so that it will be available for assessing responses to the management activities. Seems that many organizations and agencies are involved with this large project and cost sharing and expertise sharing is occurring.
First Round ISRP Date: 10/18/2010
First Round ISRP Rating: Meets Scientific Review Criteria
First Round ISRP Comment:
This is a well developed, well designed and important program for the Fish and Wildlife Program that supports a clear need that will benefit salmonids in the Columbia River Basin. The investigators have demonstrated that avian predation concentrated in certain specific areas has a large effect on salmonid outmigrant survival. They developed the necessary data to show this need and to support the management plans to move nesting birds and reduce the predation. The work proposed will continue these efforts, support efforts to move cormorants to appropriate nesting locations, and continue to determine the importance of predation by other nesting waterbirds (including the relatively recent arrival of pelicans in the estuary). This study is important to understanding the predation rate of fish-eating birds on various salmon stocks. This rate is being evaluated in considerable detail; however, the predator influence on the overall survival rate of the various stocks seems unknown (is it mostly compensated for or is it additive)? For a true cost-benefit analysis, this question needs to be answered. Perhaps avian biologists working with salmon biologists can address this critical issue by working together on salmon life stage models for various stocks, especially since predation rates seem to vary among species and stocks.

1. Purpose, Significance to Regional Programs, Technical Background, and Objectives

Evaluate efficacy and management initiative implemented to reduce predation on juvenile salmonids by Caspian terns and double-crested cormorants on East Sand Island and develop plans for long-term management of avian predation, as warranted. Data indicates that most significant impacts to smolt survival occur in Columbia River estuary, although populations at other sites may be a concern to local stocks. The two avian species now take 15-20 million smolts annually, i.e., ~15% of all smolts. Stocks affected include every ESA-listed stock from throughout the Basin.

The project’s plan is to (1) evaluate efficacy of management initiative implemented to reduce tern predation on East Sand Island, (2) collect compile and analyze data needed for NEPA analyses required to manage cormorants on East Sand Island, and once implemented evaluate efficacy of management actions, and (3) investigate impacts on juvenile salmonids of other piscivorous birds (Brown Pelicans, White Pelicans, Brandt’s Cormorants and gull species), including interactions with smolt losses from Caspian Terns and Double-crested Cormorants. Specifically, assess changes in tern habitat use, colony size, productivity, diet composition, smolt consumption and stock-specific predation rates (associated with reducing the acreage for nesting on East Sand Island from 5 to 1.5 acres. Basically the same approach seems to be followed with cormorants, but it is still in early stages and has not progressed as far.

Nice background information is given, with many detailed publications. Tern population is relatively stable since 1998, but cormorant populations more than doubled. More salmonids are now eaten by cormorants than terns. However, similar to other predator control projects, there is the lingering concern of the importance of predation losses via birds relative to overarching factors such as ocean survival.

2. History: Accomplishments, Results, and Adaptive Management

Systemwide losses of juvenile salmonids to Caspian Terns in estuary amount to 3.6-6.7 million smolts per year, even after management to date. The colony on Rice Island was moved to E. Sand Island (closer to ocean) where diet would hopefully include fewer salmonids. A Caspian Tern dietary change indeed took place (from 90% salmonids to 47% salmonids) with a 62% reduction in consumption of smolts. Further management was needed with the goal in 2006 to redistribute half to two-thirds of E. Sand Island tern colony to alternative sites in Oregon and California, with goal to reduce smolt loss another 50% while still maintaining a viable tern population. Eight artificial islands were constructed in Oregon and California as alternative tern nesting habitat with more nesting islands planned as the size of the nesting area on E. Sand Island is reduced from 5 to 1.5 acres. Double-crested Cormorants on E. Sand Island in 2009 consumed 11.1 million smolts and the colony now represents 41% of the population in western North America. As with the tern, any management of the cormorants will likely require an analysis under NEPA which includes (1) assessment of population status in Pacific states, (2)available suitable alternative nesting habitat outside Columbia Basin, and (3) potential enhancement of salmonid recovery rates in Columbia River should management of cormorants be implemented. The project shows a history of solving problems with fish-eating birds and seems to be planning far ahead to obtain the information needed to assess responses from current or planned management activities. Many results have been published in peer reviewed journals. Raw data have been archived and are available to others. Adaptive Management is clearly demonstrated.

3. Project Relationships, Emerging Limiting Factors, and Tailored Questions for Type of Work (Hatchery, RME, Tagging)

Research, monitoring and evaluation of piscivorous waterbird colonies are paramount to success of several regional fish and wildlife recovery plans. Numbers and percentages of smolts consumed by avian predators are needed to assess the success of management activities. Furthermore, the investigators plan to evaluate whether reduction in smolt consumption associated with management of birds in the estuary is compensated by commensurate increases in predation by other avian populations. The diet data will provide information on impacts of avian predation to salmonid and non-salmonid species alike. The study is designed to broaden knowledge of fish mortality through understanding predator-prey interactions (on a species and stock basis). The study is dependent upon PIT tags applied by many salmon researchers. This indicates that avian biologists are working with salmon biologists.

A big question that does not seem to be fully discussed is, “What influence has the smolt loss from avian predation had on the adult return rate (survival) of various salmon stocks?” Some scenarios were discussed, but from what was presented, these seemed to be “what if” type presentations. The time is now to ask the question, “What type of data are necessary to fully understand what percentage of this avian predation loss is additive vs. compensatory?” It would seem like a real cost-benefit analysis needs the answer to this question. Game bird and waterfowl management has been concerned about compensatory and additive mortality for decades when determining harvest rates by hunting, so perhaps some approaches can be found in that literature. Emerging factors, especially climate change as it affects bird distribution, are acknowledged and factored into study designs. The investigators are apparently working with various management agencies across a broad geographic scope.

4. Deliverables, Work Elements, Metrics, and Methods

Fourteen deliverables were described and were very specific with respect to types of data being collected and types of reports that will be prepared (usually journal articles). The techniques were described, and most were standard techniques or techniques they developed and described in earlier years of this study. A few methods were slightly modified when changes needed to be made for a different species. The deliverables were listed for both Caspian terns and double-crested cormorants. Certainly the investigators planned far ahead, e.g., collecting pre-management activity data so that it will be available for assessing responses to the management activities. Seems that many organizations and agencies are involved with this large project and cost sharing and expertise sharing is occurring.
Documentation Links:

2008 FCRPS BiOp Workgroup Assessment

Assessment Number: 1997-024-00-BIOP-20101105
Project Number: 1997-024-00
Review: RME / AP Category Review
Proposal Number: RMECAT-1997-024-00
Completed Date: None
2008 FCRPS BiOp Workgroup Rating: Supports 2008 FCRPS BiOp
Comments: BiOp Workgroup Comments: No BiOp Workgroup comments

The BiOp RM&E Workgroups made the following determinations regarding the proposal's ability or need to support BiOp Research, Monitoring and Evaluation (RME) RPAs. If you have questions regarding these RPA association conclusions, please contact your BPA COTR and they will help clarify, or they will arrange further discussion with the appropriate RM&E Workgroup Leads. BiOp RPA associations for the proposed work are: ( 66 67 68)
All Questionable RPA Associations ( ) and
All Deleted RPA Associations (54.8)
Proponent Response:
Review: FY07-09 Solicitation Review

Council Recommendation

Assessment Number: 1997-024-00-NPCC-20090924
Project: 1997-024-00 - Avian Predation on Juvenile Salmonids
Review: FY07-09 Solicitation Review
Approved Date: 10/23/2006
Recommendation: Fund
Comments: Scope expansion not accepted. Budget at the FY 2006 level.

Independent Scientific Review Panel Assessment

Assessment Number: 1997-024-00-ISRP-20060831
Project: 1997-024-00 - Avian Predation on Juvenile Salmonids
Review: FY07-09 Solicitation Review
Completed Date: 8/31/2006
Final Round ISRP Date: None
Final Round ISRP Rating: Meets Scientific Review Criteria (Qualified)
Final Round ISRP Comment:
This is a strong proposal, and avian predation is definitely a problem that has been documented in a useful series of studies. This project is being funded by a number of entities, the Corps and BPA. The Council/BPA/Corps and the sponsor should clearly delineate who is funding which tasks.

This recommendation is qualified, because the ISRP questions whether it is necessary to condition new sites for the terns (this pertains only to those sites more than 200 miles away), or even evaluate potential new habitat at great distances from the present colonies. These birds are adept at finding suitable habitat when the present habitat is no longer rendered suitable and will likely redistribute to their more historical range, instead of the recent concentration in the Columbia River estuary. More suitable alternative sites need to be provided within 200 miles of the present colonies, because birds need alternative sites or they will not readily move.

Fisheries investigators should consider a similar approach to this project's in sampling for PIT tags in dredge material at Burbank Slough (at mouth of Snake and Columbia).
Documentation Links:

Legal Assessment (In-Lieu)

Assessment Number: 1997-024-00-INLIEU-20090521
Project Number: 1997-024-00
Review: FY07-09 Solicitation Review
Completed Date: 10/6/2006
In Lieu Rating: Problems May Exist
Cost Share Rating: 1 - Appears reasonable
Comment: RM&E regarding avian predation; fishery managers, Corps authorized/required; cost share appears sufficient.

Capital Assessment

Assessment Number: 1997-024-00-CAPITAL-20090618
Project Number: 1997-024-00
Review: FY07-09 Solicitation Review
Completed Date: 2/27/2007
Capital Rating: Does Not Qualify for Capital Funding
Capital Asset Category: None
Comment: None

Project Relationships: None

Name Role Organization
Daniel Roby Project Lead Oregon State University
Ken Collis Project Lead Real Time Research
Daniel Gambetta Env. Compliance Lead Bonneville Power Administration
Peter Lofy Supervisor Bonneville Power Administration
Steven Gagnon Project Manager Bonneville Power Administration