Based on your permissions you can access the following related pages:
Follow this via RSS feed. Help setting up RSS feeds?
View and print project details including project summary, purpose, associations to Biological Opinions, and area. To learn more about any of the project properties, hold your mouse cursor over the field label.
Please Note: This project is the product of one or more merges and/or splits from other projects. Historical data automatically included here are limited to the current project and previous generation (the “parent” projects) only. The Project Relationships section details the nature of the relationships between this project and the previous generation. To learn about the complete ancestry of this project, please review the Project Relationships section on the Project Summary page of each parent project.
| Province | Subbasin | % |
|---|---|---|
| Blue Mountain | Grande Ronde | 100.00% |
|
|
Description: Page: 1 Cover: Cover photo Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1013 x 759 Description: Page: 11 Figure 3: Presence/absence of spring Chinook salmon in the upper Grande Ronde and Catherine Creek basins in 2011. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1430 x 1105 Description: Page: 40 Figure A-1a-1: Map of Grande Ronde Basin showing locations of temperature monitoring stations for each coordinating agency (CRITFC, CTUIR, ODFW, and USFS) and land use designation. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1431 x 1852 Description: Page: 41 Figure A-1a-2: Map of Grande Ronde Basin showing locations of flow monitoring stations that are included in raFT (yes, no) and land use designation (managed by: USGS, OWRD, and other unknown). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1431 x 1852 Description: Page: 42 Figure A-1a-3: Map of Grande Ronde Basin showing locations of water quality monitoring stations included in Lasar (DEQ) by monitoring medium (groundwater (GW), surface water (SW) and staff gauges (ST)) and land use designation. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 976 x 1221 Description: Page: 70 Appendix C Cover: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 608 x 513 Description: Page: 78 Figure C-3: Juvenile steelhead/rainbow trout. Note the oval parr marks, prevalent spotting, and white tips on the pelvic and anal fins (from Thurow 1994). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 712 x 370 Description: Page: 78 Figure C-4: Juvenile Chinook salmon. Note the broad, vertical parr marks, large eye, unspotted dorsal fin, forked tail, and dorsal spotting. The adipose fin has been clipped from this hatchery-reared fish (From Thurow 1994). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 706 x 374 Description: Page: 79 Figure C-5: Adult bull trout. Note the large mouth, pale yellow spots, white fin margins, and unpigmented dorsal fin (from Thurow 1994). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 712 x 370 Description: Page: 79 Figure C-6: Adult mountain whitefish. Note slender body, small terminal mouth, silver color, large scales reflecting light, and forked tail (from Thurow 1994). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 575 x 296 Description: Page: 79 Figure C-7: Adult northern pikeminnow. Note the large mouth, forked tail, lack of spots, and absence of an adipose fin (from Thurow 1994). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 716 x 206 Description: Page: 80 Figure C-8: Juvenile redside shiner. Note the lack of parr marks, lack of spots and parr marks, absence of adipose fin, and a distinct, laterally-compressed shape (from Thurow 1994). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 711 x 375 Description: Page: 80 Figure C-9: Sucker sp. Note the large head, small eye, oval cross section, and ventral mouth (from Thurow 1994). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 703 x 367 Description: Page: 80 Figure C-10: Longnose dace. Note the elongated body shape and nose (courtesy of Ohio Department of Natural Resources). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 640 x 297 Description: Page: 81 Figure C-11: Speckled dace. Note the elongated, fusiform body shape and shorter nose as compared with longnose dace (photo by Dave Giordano, University of California). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 530 x 290 Description: Page: 86 Appendix D Cover Photo a: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 704 x 527 Description: Page: 86 Appendix D Cover Photo b: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 704 x 528 Description: Page: 95 Figure D-1: Subsurface sediment sampling sites in the Upper Grande Ronde River and Catherine Creek basins during summer, 2011. The size of each red circle is proportional to the amount of fines < 6.35 mm measured at each site. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1320 x 1020 Description: Page: 112 Figure E-1a: Study areas in (a) Catherine Creek (b) the Upper Grande Ronde River. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1100 x 850 Description: Page: 112 Figure E-1b: Study areas in (a) Catherine Creek (b) the Upper Grande Ronde River. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 742 x 573 Description: Page: 124 Appendix F Cover: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 352 x 341 Description: Page: 130 Figure F-1: An iButton in a funnel radiation shield in a tree. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 614 x 801 Description: Page: 344 Figure I-1: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 770 x 457 Description: Page: 347 Figure I-2: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 728 x 446 Description: Page: 349 Figure I-3: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 767 x 420 Description: Page: 351 Figure I-4: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 687 x 399 Description: Page: 353 Figure I-5: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 732 x 393 Description: Page: 355 Figure I-6: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 629 x 405 Description: Page: 357 Figure I-7: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 701 x 431 Description: Page: 359 Figure I-8: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 691 x 421 Description: Page: 361 Figure I-9: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 653 x 380 Description: Page: 363 Figure I-10: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 763 x 430 Description: Page: 365 Figure I-11: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 789 x 449 Description: Page: 367 Figure I-12: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 803 x 447 Description: Page: 369 Figure I-13: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 751 x 448 Description: Page: 371 Figure I-14: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 639 x 449 Description: Page: 373 Figure I-15: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 710 x 444 Description: Page: 375 Figure I-16: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 620 x 452 Description: Page: 377 Figure I-17: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 712 x 442 Description: Page: 379 Figure I-18: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 762 x 452 Description: Page: 381 Figure I-19: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 626 x 441 Description: Page: 383 Figure I-20: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 783 x 444 Description: Page: 385 Figure I-21: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 752 x 458 Description: Page: 387 Figure I-22: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 826 x 448 Description: Page: 389 Figure I-23: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 716 x 455 Description: Page: 391 Figure I-24: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 658 x 451 Description: Page: 393 Figure I-25: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 741 x 451 Description: Page: 395 Figure I-26: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 697 x 456 Description: Page: 397 Figure I-27: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 714 x 451 Description: Page: 399 Figure I-28: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 642 x 450 Description: Page: 401 Figure I-29: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 774 x 462 Description: Page: 403 Figure I-30: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 769 x 455 Description: Page: 405 Figure I-31: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 785 x 459 Description: Page: 440 Figure J-1: Three decades of Aquatic Habitat Inventory survey data collected in the Grande Ronde Basin. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1430 x 1191 Description: Page: 466 Appendix K Cover: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 663 x 498 Description: Page: 520 Appendix O Cover: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 784 x 546 Description: Page: 532 Figure O-1: Streams of interest in the upper Grande Ronde River subbasin. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1430 x 996 Description: Page: 533 Figure O-2: LiDAR data coverage. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1429 x 1104 Description: Page: 534 Figure O-3: LiDAR point cloud cross section over Beaver Creek. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1011 x 1113 Description: Page: 535 Figure O-4: LiDAR point cloud with RGB extraction (top) and bare earth digital terrain model (bottom). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1534 x 1819 Description: Page: 536 Figure O-5: LiDAR digital elevation model of the Grande Ronde River near Hilgard. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1279 x 1733 Description: Page: 537 Figure O-6: TIR data extents. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1429 x 1104 Description: Page: 539 Figure O-10: Advanced imagery of an active diversion used to study chinook salmon recovery trends. Courtesy of CRITFC. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 940 x 418 Description: Page: 540 Figure O-11: Hourly stream temperature monitoring locations. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1429 x 1104 Description: Page: 542 Figure O-15: Instantaneous flow measurement locations. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1429 x 1104 Description: Page: 543 Figure O-16: Flow gage locations. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1429 x 1104 Description: Page: 544 Figure O-17: Climate station locations. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1429 x 1104 Description: Page: 546 Figure O-20: TTools sampling extents Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1429 x 1104 Description: Page: 548 Figure O-22: Raw stream polyline. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1429 x 577 Description: Page: 548 Figure O-23: Smoothed stream polyline. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1429 x 559 Description: Page: 549 Figure O-24: Stream polyline overlaid on LiDAR intensity image. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1429 x 636 Description: Page: 549 Figure O-25: Estimated wetted area based on LiDAR intensity image. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1429 x 688 Description: Page: 550 Figure O-26: Wetted channel edges (yellow) and active channel edges (red). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1430 x 1407 Description: Page: 551 Figure O-27: Manually digitized near stream land cover polygons. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1434 x 1435 Description: Page: 552 Figure O-28: 50-meter stream segments (yellow dots). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1646 x 1312 Description: Page: 553 Figure O-29: Stream channel edges and the TTools point shapefile. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1115 x 545 Description: Page: 553 Figure O-30: Stream elevations sampled at each 50-meter node. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 774 x 295 Description: Page: 554 Figure O-31: Topographic features to the west (green triangles), south (red circles) and east (white squares). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1870 x 1289 Description: Page: 555 Figure O-32a: Near stream land cover radial sampling pattern. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 377 x 382 Description: Page: 555 Figure O-32b: Near stream land cover radial sampling pattern. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 383 x 383 Description: Page: 556 Figure O-33: Example of 50-meter stream nodes and TIR data points. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1427 x 1322 Description: Page: 564 Appendix O Section Cover: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - North Fork Catherine Creek looking upstream just above mouth (road visible alongside stream). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 752 x 677 Description: Page: 568 Figure O-47: North Fork Catherine Creek simulation extent. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1432 x 1107 Description: Page: 572 Photo O-1: LiDAR point cloud with RGB extraction – North Fork Catherine Creek upper reach. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 729 x 477 Description: Page: 573 Photo O-2: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - South Fork Catherine Creek looking upstream toward Corral Creek confluence. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 612 x 472 Description: Page: 577 Figure O-58: South Fork Catherine Creek simulation extent. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1432 x 1107 Description: Page: 582 Photo O-3: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - Looking upstream from mouth of Milk Creek (Medical Springs Highway on left). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 759 x 677 Description: Page: 586 Figure O-69: Milk Creek simulation extent. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1432 x 1107 Description: Page: 590 Appendix O Section Cover: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - Little Catherine Creek (flowing top right to middle of image) confluence with Catherine Creek (flowing from bottom to top left of image). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 780 x 739 Description: Page: 593 Figure O-79: Little Catherine Creek digitized near stream land cover. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 969 x 1020 Description: Page: 594 Figure O-80: Little Catherine Creek simulation extent. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1432 x 1107 Description: Page: 596 Appendix O Section Cover: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - Little Creek looking downstream where it enters valley bottom. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 741 x 667 Description: Page: 596 Figure O-87: Little Creek simulation extent. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 741 x 667 Description: Page: 605 Appendix O Section Cover: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - Looking downstream Ladd Creek at the mouth. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 714 x 596 Description: Page: 608 Figure O-97: Ladd Creek digitized near stream land cover. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 963 x 1021 Description: Page: 609 Figure O-98: Ladd Creek simulation extent. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1432 x 1107 Description: Page: 612 Appendix O Section Cover: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - Catherine Creek in Union (looking upstream). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 785 x 899 Description: Page: 616 Figure O-106: Catherine Creek simulation extent. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1432 x 1107 Description: Page: 621 Photo O-4: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - Catherine Creek downstream of Warm Creek. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 779 x 346 Description: Page: 622 Appendix O Section Cover: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - Clear Creek looking upstream from near mouth. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 776 x 774 Description: Page: 626 Figure O-117: Clear Creek simulation extent. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1432 x 1107 Description: Page: 630 Appendix O Section Cover: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - Limber Jim Creek looking downstream just below the North Fork. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 637 x 679 Description: Page: 634 Figure O-128: Limber Jim Creek simulation extent. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1432 x 1107 Description: Page: 640 Appendix O Section Cover: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - Chicken Creek (flowing from bottom of image) at confluence with Sheep Creek. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 839 x 899 Description: Page: 643 Figure O-138: Chicken Creek digitized near stream land cover. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 969 x 985 Description: Page: 645 Figure O-139: Chicken Creek simulation extent. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1432 x 1107 Description: Page: 649 Appendix O Section Cover: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - Sheep Creek downstream of East Sheep Creek (looking upstream). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 780 x 846 Description: Page: 653 Figure O-150: Sheep Creek simulation extent. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1432 x 1107 Description: Page: 658 Appendix O Section Cover: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - Fly Creek just above mouth (looking upstream). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 784 x 763 Description: Page: 662 Figure O-162: Fly Creek simulation extent. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1432 x 1107 Description: Page: 667 Appendix O Section Cover: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - McCoy Creek just above mouth – the once channelized stream has been restored to its original channel. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 858 x 899 Description: Page: 671 Figure O-173: McCoy Creek simulation extent. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1432 x 1107 Description: Page: 672 Figure O-175: McCoy Creek typical terrain and vegetation. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 780 x 420 Description: Page: 673 Appendix O Section Cover: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - Meadow Creek looking downstream near Smith Creek. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 773 x 703 Description: Page: 677 Figure O-182: Meadow Creek simulation extent. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1432 x 1107 Description: Page: 684 Appendix O Section Cover: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - Beaver Creek near Little Beaver Creek (stream flowing from right to left of image). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 740 x 634 Description: Page: 688 Figure O-194: Beaver Creek simulation extent. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 780 x 603 Description: Page: 693 Appendix O Section Cover: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - Five Points Creek below Little John Day Creek (looking downstream). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 783 x 914 Description: Page: 697 Figure O-206: Five Points Creek simulation extent. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 780 x 603 Description: Page: 702 Appendix O Section Cover: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - Grande Ronde River alongside Interstate 84, below Five Points Creek (looking downstream). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 778 x 857 Description: Page: 705 Photo O-5: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - Grande Ronde River at Vey Meadow (flowing from right to left of image). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 774 x 445 Description: Page: 706 Figure O-217: Grande Ronde River simulation extent. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 780 x 603 Description: Page: 707 Photo O-6: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - Grande Ronde River above Meadow Creek (looking downstream). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 782 x 813 Description: Page: 717 Photo O-7: RGB-colored LiDAR point cloud - Grande Ronde River below the city of La Grande (looking upstream). Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 781 x 953 Description: Page: 738 Appendix P Section Cover: No caption provided. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 773 x 596 Description: Page: 744 Figure P-1a: Solmetric SunEye Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 683 x 689 Description: Page: 744 Figure P-1b: Solar Pathfinder. Site CBW05583-321338, Transect 11. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 690 x 688 Description: Page: 764 Map Q-1: Map of Grande Ronde River Basin. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 591 x 599 Description: Page: 779 Photo R-1a: Optional SunEye Extension Kit ($500) Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 816 x 614 Description: Page: 779 Photo R-1b: Optional SunEye Extension Kit ($500) Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 816 x 614 Description: Page: 794 Figure S-1: Location of Columbia Habitat Monitoring Program (CHaMP) watersheds in 2011 and the Minam River basin. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1407 x 1371 Description: Page: 795 Figure S-2: Map of Grande Ronde River basin in NE Oregon including CRITFC’s focal watersheds upper Grande Ronde River, Catherine Creek, and Minam River. Project(s): 2009-004-00 Document: P125847 Dimensions: 1056 x 816 |
To view all expenditures for all fiscal years, click "Project Exp. by FY"
To see more detailed project budget information, please visit the "Project Budget" page
| Acct FY | Acct Type | Amount | Fund | Budget Decision | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2022 | Expense | $827,890 | From: Fish Accord - LRT - CRITFC | Accord Extensions (CRITFC) 10/4/2018 | 10/04/2018 |
| FY2022 | Expense | $171,494 | From: Fish Accord - LRT - CRITFC | Accord Transfers (CRITFC) 1/26/2022 | 01/26/2022 |
| FY2022 | Expense | $150,000 | To: Fish Accord - LRT - CRITFC | Accord Transfers (CRITFC, CTUIR, Montana, WS) 5/9/2022 | 05/09/2022 |
| FY2023 | Expense | $855,968 | From: Fish Accord - LRT - CRITFC | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) 2023-2025 Accord Extension | 09/30/2022 |
| FY2023 | Expense | $105,065 | From: Fish Accord - LRT - CRITFC | Accord Transfers (CRITFC) 3/16/2023 | 03/16/2023 |
| FY2023 | Expense | $160,196 | From: Fish Accord - LRT - CRITFC | Accord Transfers (CRITFC) 3/16/2023 | 03/16/2023 |
| FY2023 | Expense | $15,247 | From: Fish Accord - LRT - CRITFC | Accord Transfers (CRITFC) 5/19/2023 | 05/19/2023 |
| FY2024 | Expense | $877,367 | From: Fish Accord - LRT - CRITFC | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) 2023-2025 Accord Extension | 09/30/2022 |
| Number | Contractor Name | Title | Status | Total Contracted Amount | Dates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
42059
 SOW
|
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2009-004-00 EXP MOA MONITORG RECOVERY TRENDS IN KEY SP CHIN HABIT | Closed | $533,507 | 4/1/2009 - 3/31/2010 |
|
46708
SOW
|
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 200900400 EXP MONITOR RECOVERY TREND KEY SPRING CHINOOK HABITAT | Closed | $658,859 | 4/1/2010 - 3/31/2011 |
|
52292
SOW
|
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 200900400 EXP MONITORING RECOVERY TREND KEY SPRG CHINOOK HABITAT | Closed | $804,023 | 4/1/2011 - 3/31/2012 |
|
56725
SOW
|
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2009-004-00 EXP MONITOR RECOVERY TREND KEY SPG CHINOOK HABITAT 12 | Closed | $1,009,452 | 4/1/2012 - 3/31/2013 |
|
60598
SOW
|
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2009-004-00 EXP MONITOR RECOVERY TREND KEY SPG CHINOOK HABITAT 13 | Closed | $954,234 | 4/1/2013 - 3/31/2014 |
|
64398
SOW
|
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2009-004-00 EXP MONITOR RECOVERY TREND KEY SPG CHINOOK HABITAT 14 | Closed | $1,126,974 | 4/1/2014 - 3/31/2015 |
|
68574
SOW
|
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2009-004-00 EXP MONITOR RECOVERY TREND KEY SPG CHINOOK HABITAT 15 | Closed | $843,855 | 4/1/2015 - 3/31/2016 |
|
71725
SOW
|
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2009-004-00 EXP MONITOR RECOVERY TREND KEY SPG CHINOOK HABITAT 16 | Closed | $792,412 | 4/1/2016 - 3/31/2017 |
| BPA-009835 | Bonneville Power Administration | PIT Tags - Monitoring Recovery Trends | Active | $3,318 | 10/1/2016 - 9/30/2017 |
|
75586
SOW
|
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2009-004-00 EXP MONITOR RECOVERY TREND KEY SPG CHINOOK HABITAT 17 | Closed | $724,949 | 4/1/2017 - 3/31/2018 |
|
73354 REL 2
SOW
|
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2009-004-00 EXP MONITOR RECOVERY TREND KEY SPG CHINOOK HABITAT 18 | Closed | $697,635 | 4/1/2018 - 3/31/2019 |
|
73354 REL 22
SOW
|
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2009-004-00 EXP MONITOR RECOVERY TREND KEY SPG CHINOOK HABITAT 19 | Closed | $756,942 | 4/1/2019 - 3/31/2020 |
|
73354 REL 40
SOW
|
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2009-004-00 EXP MONITOR RECOVERY TREND KEY SPG CHINOOK HABITAT 20 | Issued | $1,054,545 | 4/1/2020 - 3/31/2021 |
|
73354 REL 55
SOW
|
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2009-004-00 EXP MONITOR RECOVERY TREND KEY SPG CHINOOK HABITAT 21 | Closed | $996,826 | 4/1/2021 - 6/30/2022 |
|
90582
SOW
|
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2009-004-00 EXP MONITOR RECOVERY TREND KEY SPG CHINOOK HABITAT 22 | Issued | $846,016 | 7/1/2022 - 3/31/2023 |
|
92202
SOW
|
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2009-004-00 EXP MONITOR RECOVERY TRENDS KEY SPRING CHINOOK | Issued | $1,121,229 | 4/1/2023 - 3/31/2024 |
| Annual Progress Reports | |
|---|---|
| Expected (since FY2004): | 14 |
| Completed: | 9 |
| On time: | 9 |
| Status Reports | |
|---|---|
| Completed: | 56 |
| On time: | 25 |
| Avg Days Late: | 1 |
| Count of Contract Deliverables | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earliest Contract | Subsequent Contracts | Title | Contractor | Earliest Start | Latest End | Latest Status | Accepted Reports | Complete | Green | Yellow | Red | Total | % Green and Complete | Canceled |
| 42059 | 46708, 52292, 56725, 60598, 64398, 68574, 71725, 75586, 73354 REL 2, 73354 REL 22, 73354 REL 40, 73354 REL 55, 90582, 92202 | 2009-004-00 EXP MONITOR RECOVERY TRENDS KEY SPRING CHINOOK | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 04/01/2009 | 03/31/2024 | Issued | 56 | 180 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 194 | 92.78% | 4 |
| BPA-9835 | PIT Tags - Monitoring Recovery Trends | Bonneville Power Administration | 10/01/2016 | 09/30/2017 | Active | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Project Totals | 56 | 180 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 194 | 92.78% | 4 | ||||||
| Assessment Number: | 2009-004-00-NPCC-20230316 |
|---|---|
| Project: | 2009-004-00 - Monitoring Recovery Trends in Key Spring Chinook Habitat Variables and Validation of Population Viability Indicators |
| Review: | 2022 Anadromous Fish Habitat & Hatchery Review |
| Approved Date: | 4/15/2022 |
| Recommendation: | Implement |
| Comments: |
Bonneville and Sponsor to take the review remarks into consideration in project documentation. [Background: See https://www.nwcouncil.org/2021-2022-anadromous-habitat-and-hatchery-review/] |
| Assessment Number: | 2009-004-00-ISRP-20230413 |
|---|---|
| Project: | 2009-004-00 - Monitoring Recovery Trends in Key Spring Chinook Habitat Variables and Validation of Population Viability Indicators |
| Review: | 2022 Anadromous Fish Habitat & Hatchery Review |
| Completed Date: | 4/13/2023 |
| Final Round ISRP Date: | 2/10/2022 |
| Final Round ISRP Rating: | Meets Scientific Review Criteria |
| Final Round ISRP Comment: | |
|
This Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission project provides critical research and monitoring for the Grande Ronde River basin. They provide information and analyses that are used by the Grande Ronde Model Watershed Umbrella Project as well as by a large number of habitat restoration projects, state and Federal agencies, recovery plans, and the Fish and Wildlife Program. The proponents provide clear responses to past Council recommendations and ISRP reviews. It is an exemplary project that balances rigorous primary research with monitoring of status and trends of habitat conditions and populations of salmon and steelhead. This is among the most productive projects in the Columbia Basin in terms of peer-reviewed publications, publicly accessible databases, methods development, and integration reports. They have developed a strong reputation as a valued cooperator and leader in conservation and restoration within the Basin. The proposal is clearly written, informative, consistent with the requested format, and could serve as an example for other projects. M&E matrix - support. As habitat projects and monitoring projects are not presented as part of an integrated proposal or plan, the need for a crosswalk to identify the linkages between implementation and monitoring is extremely important for basins or geographic areas. The ISRP is requesting a response from the Grande Ronde Model Watershed Project (199202601) to summarize the linkages between implementation and monitoring projects in the Grande Ronde and Imnaha geographic area. During the response loop (September 24 to November 22, 2021) , we ask this project to assist them in creating the summary and provide information to them about what is being monitored by this project and where and when the monitoring occurs. A map or maps of locations of monitoring actions would be helpful in this regard. Q1: Clearly defined objectives and outcomes The proponents provide clearly written goals and objectives and integrate them with the description of methods and the project timelines. While the objectives are not quantitative and SMART, they do clearly outline the scope of the project. Revising objectives to be more quantitative (SMART) would make assessing their achievement simpler and more obvious. As they stand, they are essentially implementation targets for RM&E efforts. The ISRP encourages the proponents to make their objectives quantitative and time-bound where possible. These improved objectives can be included in future annual reports or included in a revised proposal that the proponents can use for project operations and internal evaluation. Q2: Methods The proposal clearly describes the methods for each objective, with additional documentation, information in appendices, and details in MonitoringResources.org. The project proposes a series of high-impact activities that will benefit the Grande Ronde and Minam rivers and will refine methods that likely will be used by others in the Columbia River Basin. The proposal includes a robust plan for managing and sharing data, including dissemination of the life cycle model. Two key examples stand out with respect to contributions beyond this project. First, the use of a life cycle model for evaluating restoration actions is an effective and meaningful way to understand restoration benefits that addresses issues of natural variability and out-of-basin factors. This practice should be encouraged in other basins. One example of an important and distressing finding from the life cycle modeling efforts is that extinction risk is certain for the Upper Grande Ronde population. If results are confirmed with the updated model and data, they will have major implications for ongoing restoration efforts in the basin and beyond. Second, the White et al. 2021 Fisheries publication is an important resource for other programs in the basin, and Council should work with the authors to find a way to broadly disseminate it. Q3: Provisions for M&E The proponents have responded positively to past ISRP conditions and recommendations. The project not only has developed a thorough and careful annual evaluation process both internally and externally but has also assisted the Grande Ronde Model Watershed in its development of an excellent adaptive evaluation process. Further, the project has reported on its approach to adaptive management in the peer-reviewed publication in Fisheries. This project clearly is a regional leader in the Pacific Northwest and provides value added for both Tribal and non-Tribal projects in the Columbia River Basin. The proponents’ discussion of potential confounding factors includes climate change, food webs, land use change, and a development of life cycle models. They not only describe these confounding factors, but they also explicitly describe how their work and published products inform regional resource managers in addressing these critical confounding factors through restoration actions. Q4: Results – benefits to fish and wildlife The proposal contains extensive and detailed description of the project’s accomplishments, quantitative outcomes, and benefits to fish and wildlife. Many of their achievements and ecological analyses have been documented in recent peer-reviewed literature. Their description of Progress to Date in Appendix B was extremely impressive and informative, and supplemented an already impressive description of benefits to fish and wildlife in the proposal text. Their results provide information and regional syntheses sorely needed by the Fish and Wildlife Program. While the results may not always be what others want to see, they are charting a way forward that will reap important benefits for fish and wildlife. Reference White, S.M., S. Brandy, C. Justice, K.A. Morinaga, L. Naylor, J. Ruzycki, E.R. Sedell, J. Steele, A. Towne James, G. Webster, and I. Wilson. Progress towards a comprehensive approach for habitat restoration in the Columbia Basin: Case study in the Grande Ronde River. Fisheries, December 4, 2020, fsh.10562. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsh.10562 |
|
| Documentation Links: |
|
| Assessment Number: | 2009-004-00-NPCC-20210302 |
|---|---|
| Project: | 2009-004-00 - Monitoring Recovery Trends in Key Spring Chinook Habitat Variables and Validation of Population Viability Indicators |
| Review: | 2018 Research Project Status Review |
| Approved Date: | 12/20/2018 |
| Recommendation: | Implement |
| Comments: | Recommendation: Sponsor is requested to submit an updated proposal for the 2021 Anadromous Habitat and Hatchery Review that addresses all ISRP qualifications. See Habitat Programmatic Issue. See programmatic issues for Information Sharing and Reporting. |
| Assessment Number: | 2009-004-00-ISRP-20100323 |
|---|---|
| Project: | 2009-004-00 - Monitoring Recovery Trends in Key Spring Chinook Habitat Variables and Validation of Population Viability Indicators |
| Review: | Fish Accord ISRP Review |
| Completed Date: | None |
| First Round ISRP Date: | 7/27/2009 |
| First Round ISRP Rating: | Meets Scientific Review Criteria - In Part |
| First Round ISRP Comment: | |
|
• Objective 1, tasks 1.1 through 1.4 including the scoping, coordination, and planning tasks meet scientific review criteria • Objective 1, task 1.5 and Objectives 2 through 5 do not meet scientific review criteria based on the information provided in the proposal – response requested The ISRP requests a response to a number of questions regarding the methods used to measure habitat variables. We also request a more thorough explanation of how this study will associate improvements in habitat facilitated by restoration projects to improvements in the survival and production of various phases of spring Chinook life cycles in the upper Grande Ronde. Many of these questions are stated in 2. Objectives, Work Elements, and Methods, summarized below. The study objectives and methods are ambitious, and the ISRP requests answers to our questions so we can be confident that this important project will succeed. Additional scoping planning is necessary to guide the selection of particular variables to be measured, sampling design, field installations, equipment to be purchased, and where and when it will be installed. The ISRP does not see how it can be determined what equipment should be bought without this additional scoping and planning. Equipment should not be purchased under one objective when under the same objective funding is requested for “planning to plan” on how much equipment will be eventually needed. Based on this rationale, and given that most of the planning and critical literature review has not been done, only those aspects of the objectives involving actual scoping (i.e., “planning to plan”), planning, coordination, and literature review seem appropriate at this time. Following this scoping/planning phase when the project design has been more thoroughly formulated, the appropriate needs for equipment and facilities could then be identified and requested. Tasks 1.1 through 1.4 are thus appropriate and meet scientific criteria. Tasks 1.5 and the other Objectives (2-5) do not (yet) meet scientific criteria. A clearly articulated basis should be described for the necessary work elements under those objectives. |
|
| Documentation Links: | |
| Assessment Number: | 2009-004-00-NPCC-20110627 |
|---|---|
| Project: | 2009-004-00 - Monitoring Recovery Trends in Key Spring Chinook Habitat Variables and Validation of Population Viability Indicators |
| Review: | RME / AP Category Review |
| Proposal: | RMECAT-2009-004-00 |
| Proposal State: | Pending BPA Response |
| Approved Date: | 6/10/2011 |
| Recommendation: | Fund (In Part) |
| Comments: | See Programmatic issue #2. Implement through 2013 per Council decision Sept 22, 2010. Funding in 2014 and beyond based on ISRP and Council review of Phase 2 efforts. |
| Conditions: | |
| Council Condition #1 Programmatic Issue: RMECAT #2 Habitat effectiveness monitoring and evaluation—. | |
| Council Condition #2 Council decision on September 22, 2010. Based on the ISRP review (ISRP document 2009-33) and the current status of the project’s implementation, the Council recommends to Bonneville that the project continue its model building, as reviewed by the ISRP, but use actual (much of which it already has from FY 2009) rather than simulated data, and that implementation of the second phase of the project be based on a review by the ISRP prior to the 2014 field season. |
| Assessment Number: | 2009-004-00-BIOP-20101105 |
|---|---|
| Project Number: | 2009-004-00 |
| Review: | RME / AP Category Review |
| Proposal Number: | RMECAT-2009-004-00 |
| Completed Date: | None |
| 2008 FCRPS BiOp Workgroup Rating: | Response Requested |
| Comments: |
BiOp Workgroup Comments: BPA has questions the use of CHaMP protocols the coordination with other proejcts in the sub-basin. The BiOp RM&E Workgroups made the following determinations regarding the proposal's ability or need to support BiOp Research, Monitoring and Evaluation (RME) RPAs. If you have questions regarding these RPA association conclusions, please contact your BPA COTR and they will help clarify, or they will arrange further discussion with the appropriate RM&E Workgroup Leads. BiOp RPA associations for the proposed work are: (56.3) All Questionable RPA Associations (57.5) and All Deleted RPA Associations ( ) |
| Proponent Response: | |
|
Recommendations for Implementing Research, Monitoring and Evaluation for the 2008 NOAA Fisheries FCRPS BiOp. Draft 2009. RPA 56.3 -- Facilitate and participate in an ongoing collaboration process to develop a regional strategy In the Grande Ronde, limiting factors were listed as: Flow; Habitat diversity; Obstructions; Riparian/Off-Channel habitat; Water quality, sediment In Catherine Creek, limiting factors were listed as: Flow; Habitat diversity; Obstructions; Riparian/Off-Channel habitat; Temperature. The Upper Grande Ronde and Catherine Creek populations each have a 23% habitat gap. RPA 57.5 Action agencies will convene a regional technical group to develop an initial set of relationships in FY2008, then annually A core set of habitat metrics that need to be measured within the recommended populations will be generated based on IMW analyses, CRITFC comment (Dale McCullough): It seems appropriate that our habitat monitoring project in the Grande Ronde and Catherine Creek, using the Minam as a reference condition, is related to RPA 56.3. We are applying GRTS sampling design. However, our project is more that simply status and trend monitoring. We are developing a predictive model using key habitat variables to predict life cycle survival of spring chinook. We have made use of past subbasin plan evaluations of limiting factors and assessments leading to the Accords to identify critical variables to monitor and incorporate into our model. These variables are also consistent with those identified in this Council document on RPAs. Possibly RPA 57.5 hinges on whether CRITFC needs to be included in the Workgroup for this RPA. I will leave that to the discretion of BPA and consult with my COTR. We have been coordinating with BPA, NOAA, and ODFW concerning application of the CHamP monitoring protocol to development of consisten region-wide status and trend data. We expect to be part of the workgroup involved in application and development of CHaMP methods given that we have considerable experience in monitoring to share with the group. |
|
| Project Relationships: |
This project Merged From 2008-512-00 effective on 11/20/2008 Relationship Description: Combine all work/budgets from 2008-512-00 (& 2008-515-00, 2008-517-00) to project 2009-004-00. This project Merged From 2008-515-00 effective on 11/20/2008 Relationship Description: Combine all work/budgets from 2008-515-00 (& 2008-512-00, 2008-517-00) to project 2009-004-00. This project Merged From 2008-517-00 effective on 11/20/2008 Relationship Description: Combine all work/budgets from 2008-517-00 (& 2008-512-00, 2008-515-00) to project 2009-004-00. This project Merged From 2008-528-00 effective on 3/2/2009 Relationship Description: Combine all work/budgets from 2008-528-00 to project 2009-004-00. Three similar projects previously were combined to create 2009-004-00 (2008-515-00, 2008-517-00 and 2008-512-00). |
|---|
| Name | Role | Organization |
|---|---|---|
| Douglas Hatch | Technical Contact | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) |
| Denise Kelsey | Technical Contact | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) |
| Katey Grange | Interested Party | Bonneville Power Administration |
| Casey Justice | Project Lead | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) |
| John Skidmore | Supervisor | Bonneville Power Administration |
| Chris Roe | Administrative Contact | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) |
| Christine Golightly | Interested Party | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) |
| Benjamin Staton | Technical Contact | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) |
| Jody Lando | Project SME | Bonneville Power Administration |
| Israel Duran | Env. Compliance Lead | Bonneville Power Administration |
| Joshua Ashline | Project Manager | Bonneville Power Administration |
