Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program
RSS Feed for updates to Project 2023-002-00 - Survival & Migration of Natural Origin Chinook Follow this via RSS feed. Help setting up RSS feeds?

Project Summary

Project 2023-002-00 - Survival & Migration of Natural Origin Chinook

Please Note: This project is the product of one or more merges and/or splits from other projects. Historical data automatically included here are limited to the current project and previous generation (the “parent” projects) only. The Project Relationships section details the nature of the relationships between this project and the previous generation. To learn about the complete ancestry of this project, please review the Project Relationships section on the Project Summary page of each parent project.

Project Number:
2023-002-00
Title:
Survival & Migration of Natural Origin Chinook
Summary:
TBD
Proposer:
Proponent Orgs:
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes (Tribe)
Starting FY:
2023
Ending FY:
2025
BPA PM:
Stage:
Implementation - Project Status Report
Area:
Province Subbasin %
Upper Snake Snake Upper 100.00%
Purpose:
Artificial Production
Emphasis:
Supplementation
Focal Species:
Species Benefit:
Anadromous: 99.0%   Resident: 1.0%   Wildlife: 0.0%
Tags:
None
Special:
None
BiOp Association:
None

No photos have been uploaded yet for this Project.

Summary of Budgets

To view all expenditures for all fiscal years, click "Project Exp. by FY"

To see more detailed project budget information, please visit the "Project Budget" page

Decided Budget Transfers  (FY2022 - FY2024)

Acct FY Acct Type Amount Fund Budget Decision Date
FY2023 Expense $300,000 From: Fish Accord - Shoshone Bannock Shoshone Bannock Tribe (SBT) 2023-2025 Accord Extension 09/30/2022
FY2024 Expense $307,500 From: Fish Accord - Shoshone Bannock Shoshone Bannock Tribe (SBT) 2023-2025 Accord Extension 09/30/2022

Pending Budget Decision?  No


Actual Project Cost Share

Current Fiscal Year — 2023   DRAFT
Cost Share Partner Total Proposed Contribution Total Confirmed Contribution
There are no project cost share contributions to show.
Previous Fiscal Years
Fiscal Year Total Contributions % of Budget

Contracts

The table below contains contracts with the following statuses: Active, Closed, Complete, History, Issued.
* "Total Contracted Amount" column includes contracted amount from both capital and expense components of the contract.
Expense Contracts:
Number Contractor Name Title Status Total Contracted Amount Dates
CR-360819 SOW Shoshone-Bannock Tribes 2023-002-00 EXP SURVIVAL & MIGRATION OF NATURAL ORIGIN CHINOOK Pending $300,000 2/1/2023 - 1/31/2024



Annual Progress Reports
Expected (since FY2004):0
Completed:0
On time:0
Status Reports
Completed:0
On time:0
Avg Days Late:None

Historical from: 2008-906-00
Earliest Subsequent           Accepted Count of Contract Deliverables
Contract Contract(s) Title Contractor Start End Status Reports Complete Green Yellow Red Total % Green and Complete Canceled
44446 50777, 55968, 59430, 63505, 66662, 70744, 74802, 77111 REL 4, 77111 REL 16, 77111 REL 26, 77111 REL 33, 77111 REL 44 2008-906-00 EXP CRYSTAL SPRINGS PLANNING AND O&M Shoshone-Bannock Tribes 10/2009 10/2009 Pending 53 59 8 0 24 91 73.63% 6
BPA-008495 PIT Tags - Crystal Spgs Planning & Ops Bonneville Power Administration 10/2014 10/2014 Active 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
68026 71498, 75034, 77564, 77111 REL 14, 77111 REL 23, 77111 REL 34, 77111 REL 43 2008-906-00 EXP SURVIVAL & MIGRATION OF UPPER SALMON CHINOOK Shoshone-Bannock Tribes 02/2015 02/2015 Issued 32 101 12 0 0 113 100.00% 0
BPA-008955 PIT Tags - Crystal Spgs Planning & Ops FY16 Bonneville Power Administration 10/2015 10/2015 Active 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BPA-009448 PIT Tags, Land Acquisitions, TBL Task Orders- Crystal Springs O&M Bonneville Power Administration 10/2016 10/2016 Active 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BPA-010069 PIT Tags, Land Acquisitions, TBL Task Orders- Crystal Springs O&M Bonneville Power Administration 10/2017 10/2017 Active 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Totals 85 160 20 0 24 204 88.24% 6


The table content is updated frequently and thus contains more recent information than what was in the original proposal reviewed by ISRP and Council.

Review: RME / AP Category Review

Council Recommendation

Assessment Number: 2008-906-00-NPCC-20110105
Project: 2008-906-00 - Crystal Springs Planning and Operations/Maintenance
Review: RME / AP Category Review
Proposal: RMECAT-2008-906-00
Proposal State: Pending BPA Response
Approved Date: 6/10/2011
Recommendation: Under Review
Comments: Project implementation based on outcome of review process.

Independent Scientific Review Panel Assessment

Assessment Number: 2008-906-00-ISRP-20101015
Project: 2008-906-00 - Crystal Springs Planning and Operations/Maintenance
Review: RME / AP Category Review
Proposal Number: RMECAT-2008-906-00
Completed Date: 12/17/2010
Final Round ISRP Date: 12/17/2010
Final Round ISRP Rating: Not Applicable
Final Round ISRP Comment:
The ISRP determined that this proposal is not applicable for scientific review at this time. The ISRP anticipates reviewing a draft Master Plan for the project in Step One of the Council’s Three Step Review, so that they can provide comments and enable changes to the plan before it is finalized. The addition of the Chief Joseph consulting team is promising.

The proposed hatchery project should be developed in conjunction with the Supplementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation Program (SMEP, Project #2008-905-00). The effort should describe its relationship with Idaho Supplementation Studies (ISS), including supplementation of the ESU in the Imnaha, Johnson Creek, and Grande Ronde. Evaluation of the suitability of the Crystal Springs site should be based in part on evaluations of other supplementation projects, including the Northeast Oregon Hatchery Master Plan (Project 198805301). Kevin Myer’s (IDFG) research on Yellowstone cutthroat trout should be used to inform, evaluate and justify the use of hatcheries to produce cutthroat trout.

1. Purpose, Significance to Regional Programs, Technical Background, and Objectives

This proposal would initiate the preparation of necessary environmental and engineering documents, including the master plan and the Three Step Process. The proposed project states that it will follow HSRG recommendations. The proponents claim they will meet regional planning goals, which are primarily conservation goals. However, the proposal did not state how hatchery production and increased harvest on hatchery stocks will meet these conservation goals.


2. History: Accomplishments, Results, and Adaptive Management

Crystal Springs is an existing trout hatchery. This proposal is for development of a new hatchery program.

3. Project Relationships, Emerging Limiting Factors, and Tailored Questions for Type of Work (Hatchery, RME, Tagging)

The project is linked to SMEP projects, but the proposal did not clearly justify why they could not continue to use existing hatcheries. Justification for supplementation of cutthroat trout could have been more detailed. Some habitat projects have occurred, but it is unknown to what extent this might allow the supplemented fish to thrive. The proponent should address interactions between the proposed release of cutthroat trout and resident fishes such as redband trout.

4. Deliverables, Work Elements, Metrics, and Methods

Hatchery planning is to be subcontracted. Most details would be forthcoming in the Master Plan and subsequent reports.
First Round ISRP Date: 10/18/2010
First Round ISRP Rating: Not Applicable
First Round ISRP Comment:

The ISRP determined that this proposal is not applicable for scientific review at this time. The ISRP anticipates reviewing a draft Master Plan for the project in Step One of the Council’s Three Step Review, so that they can provide comments and enable changes to the plan before it is finalized. The addition of the Chief Joseph consulting team is promising. The proposed hatchery project should be developed in conjunction with the Supplementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation Program (SMEP, Project #2008-905-00). The effort should describe its relationship with Idaho Supplementation Studies (ISS), including supplementation of the ESU in the Imnaha, Johnson Creek, and Grande Ronde. Evaluation of the suitability of the Crystal Springs site should be based in part on evaluations of other supplementation projects, including the Northeast Oregon Hatchery Master Plan (Project 198805301). Kevin Myer’s (IDFG) research on Yellowstone cutthroat trout should be used to inform, evaluate and justify the use of hatcheries to produce cutthroat trout. 1. Purpose, Significance to Regional Programs, Technical Background, and Objectives This proposal would initiate the preparation of necessary environmental and engineering documents, including the master plan and the Three Step Process. The proposed project states that it will follow HSRG recommendations. The proponents claim they will meet regional planning goals, which are primarily conservation goals. However, the proposal did not state how hatchery production and increased harvest on hatchery stocks will meet these conservation goals. 2. History: Accomplishments, Results, and Adaptive Management Crystal Springs is an existing trout hatchery. This proposal is for development of a new hatchery program. 3. Project Relationships, Emerging Limiting Factors, and Tailored Questions for Type of Work (Hatchery, RME, Tagging) The project is linked to SMEP projects, but the proposal did not clearly justify why they could not continue to use existing hatcheries. Justification for supplementation of cutthroat trout could have been more detailed. Some habitat projects have occurred, but it is unknown to what extent this might allow the supplemented fish to thrive. The proponent should address interactions between the proposed release of cutthroat trout and resident fishes such as redband trout. 4. Deliverables, Work Elements, Metrics, and Methods Hatchery planning is to be subcontracted. Most details would be forthcoming in the Master Plan and subsequent reports.

Documentation Links:

2008 FCRPS BiOp Workgroup Assessment

Assessment Number: 2008-906-00-BIOP-20101105
Project Number: 2008-906-00
Review: RME / AP Category Review
Proposal Number: RMECAT-2008-906-00
Completed Date: None
2008 FCRPS BiOp Workgroup Rating: Supports 2008 FCRPS BiOp
Comments: BiOp Workgroup Comments: No BiOp Workgroup Comments

The BiOp RM&E Workgroups made the following determinations regarding the proposal's ability or need to support BiOp Research, Monitoring and Evaluation (RME) RPAs. If you have questions regarding these RPA association conclusions, please contact your BPA COTR and they will help clarify, or they will arrange further discussion with the appropriate RM&E Workgroup Leads. BiOp RPA associations for the proposed work are: ()
All Questionable RPA Associations () and
All Deleted RPA Associations ()
Proponent Response:

Project Relationships: This project Split From 2008-906-00 effective on 7/21/2022
Relationship Description: Stand alone contract since 2015 under 2008-906-00. Per agreement between BPA & SBT, shifting work to own project (will be agreed to in upcoming 2023 Accord Extension).


Name Role Organization
Jennifer Lord Project Manager Bonneville Power Administration
Kurt Tardy Project Lead Shoshone-Bannock Tribes
David Kaplowe Supervisor Bonneville Power Administration
Chad Colter Supervisor Shoshone-Bannock Tribes
Edward Gresh Env. Compliance Lead Bonneville Power Administration
Karen Wolfe Administrative Contact Bonneville Power Administration