View and print project details including project summary, purpose, associations to Biological Opinions, and area. To learn more about any of the project properties, hold your mouse cursor over the field label.
Province | Subbasin | % |
---|---|---|
Mainstem | - | 100.00% |
To view all expenditures for all fiscal years, click "Project Exp. by FY"
To see more detailed project budget information, please visit the "Project Budget" page
Acct FY | Acct Type | Amount | Fund | Budget Decision | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2024 | Expense | $176,783 | From: Fish Accord - LRT - CRITFC | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) 2023-2025 Accord Extension | 09/30/2022 |
FY2025 | Expense | $181,202 | From: Fish Accord - LRT - CRITFC | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) 2023-2025 Accord Extension | 09/30/2022 |
Number | Contractor Name | Title | Status | Total Contracted Amount | Dates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CR-363790 SOW | 2008-527-00 CAP Z6 CRITFC ACCORD PROJECT - CONSTRUCTION | Approved | $5,864,000 | 4/9/2025 - 12/10/2027 |
Number | Contractor Name | Title | Status | Total Contracted Amount | Dates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
48573 SOW | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2008-527-00 EXP JOHN DAY REPROGRAMMING & CONST | Closed | $134,367 | 6/1/2010 - 5/31/2011 |
53353 SOW | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2008-527-00 EXP JOHN DAY REPROGRAMMING & CONST | Closed | $160,229 | 6/1/2011 - 5/31/2012 |
57703 SOW | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2008-527-00 EXP ZONE 6 FISHERIES CRITFC ACCORDS PROJECT | Closed | $167,330 | 6/1/2012 - 5/31/2013 |
61799 SOW | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2008-527-00 EXP ZONE 6 FISHERIES CRITFC ACCORD PROJECT - FY2013 | Closed | $162,287 | 6/1/2013 - 5/31/2014 |
65421 SOW | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2008-527-00 EXP ZONE 6 FISHERIES CRITFC ACCORD PROJECT - FY2014 | Closed | $36,483 | 6/1/2014 - 5/31/2015 |
69193 SOW | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2008-527-00 EXP ZONE 6 FISHERIES CRITFC ACCORD PROJECT - FY2015 | Closed | $78,048 | 6/1/2015 - 9/30/2016 |
72827 SOW | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2008-527-00 EXP ZONE 6 FISHERIES CRITFC ACCORD PROJECT | Closed | $190,819 | 6/1/2016 - 5/31/2017 |
76699 SOW | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2008-527-00 EXP ZONE 6 FISHERIES CRITFC ACCORD PROJECT | Closed | $211,199 | 6/1/2017 - 8/31/2018 |
73354 REL 13 SOW | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2008-527-00 EXP ZONE 6 FISHERIES CRITFC ACCORD PROJECT | Closed | $155,656 | 9/1/2018 - 8/31/2019 |
73354 REL 33 SOW | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2008-527-00 EXP ZONE 6 FISHERIES CRITFC ACCORD PROJECT | Closed | $187,651 | 9/1/2019 - 8/31/2020 |
73354 REL 46 SOW | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 2008-527-00 EXP ZONE 6 FISHERIES JOHN DAY REPROGRAMMING 2020 | Closed | $83,309 | 9/1/2020 - 8/31/2021 |
89317 SOW | Tetra Tech, Inc. | 2008-527-00 EXP Z6 CRITFC ACCORD PROJECT - DESIGN SERVICES | Issued | $598,758 | 12/1/2021 - 7/31/2026 |
85228 REL 58 SOW | Mackay Sposito | 2008-527-00 EXP PROSSER CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW | Issued | $33,771 | 3/15/2024 - 4/27/2024 |
Annual Progress Reports | |
---|---|
Expected (since FY2004): | 11 |
Completed: | 7 |
On time: | 7 |
Status Reports | |
---|---|
Completed: | 45 |
On time: | 18 |
Avg Days Late: | 40 |
Count of Contract Deliverables | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Earliest Contract | Subsequent Contracts | Title | Contractor | Earliest Start | Latest End | Latest Status | Accepted Reports | Complete | Green | Yellow | Red | Total | % Green and Complete | Canceled |
48573 | 53353, 57703, 61799, 65421, 69193, 72827, 76699, 73354 REL 13, 73354 REL 33, 73354 REL 46 | 2008-527-00 EXP ZONE 6 FISHERIES JOHN DAY REPROGRAMMING 2020 | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) | 06/01/2010 | 08/31/2021 | Closed | 45 | 37 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 69 | 55.07% | 6 |
89317 | 2008-527-00 EXP Z6 CRITFC ACCORD PROJECT - DESIGN SERVICES | Tetra Tech, Inc. | 12/01/2021 | 07/31/2026 | Issued | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
85228 REL 58 | 2008-527-00 EXP PROSSER CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW | Mackay Sposito | 03/15/2024 | 04/27/2024 | Issued | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Project Totals | 45 | 37 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 69 | 55.07% | 6 |
Assessment Number: | 2008-527-00-NPCC-20210312 |
---|---|
Project: | 2008-527-00 - Zone 6 Fishery (Prosser Hatchery Upgrades) |
Review: | 2019-2021 Mainstem/Program Support |
Proposal: | NPCC19-2008-527-00 |
Proposal State: | Pending Council Recommendation |
Approved Date: | 8/25/2019 |
Recommendation: | Implement |
Comments: |
Continue to work through the master plan step review process addressing ISRP comments. This project will be considered in context during the 2021 Habitat and Hatchery Review. See Programmatic Issue for Hatchery-related work. [Background: See https:/www.nwcouncil.org/fish-and-wildlife/fish-and-wildlife-program/project-reviews-and-recommendations/mainstem-review] |
Assessment Number: | 2008-527-00-ISRP-20190404 |
---|---|
Project: | 2008-527-00 - Zone 6 Fishery (Prosser Hatchery Upgrades) |
Review: | 2019-2021 Mainstem/Program Support |
Proposal Number: | NPCC19-2008-527-00 |
Completed Date: | 4/19/2019 |
First Round ISRP Date: | 4/4/2019 |
First Round ISRP Rating: | Not Applicable |
First Round ISRP Comment: | |
Comment:The current proposal is not scientifically reviewable because it primarily involves planning activities. The proposal identifies three objectives with the overall goal of re-programming salmon hatchery production efforts to mitigate for salmon harvest losses associated with the construction of John Day and The Dalles dams. The Master Plan Step Review process has not begun for this hatchery re-programming effort. The ISRP will likely be asked to review the Master Plan after it is developed. 1. Objectives, Significance to Regional Programs, and Technical BackgroundThe project aims to help adjust the current stock mix of fall Chinook from the current 50:50 Up River Brights (URB) to Tule ratio to the target 75:25 URB to Tule ratio, and to move fall Chinook releases to areas directly impacted by the construction of the two dams, thereby maximizing transit of returning adults through the Zone 6 Tribal fishery. The objectives involve (1) coordination activities to facilitate re-programming, (2) project design and step review process for the hatchery, and (3) hatchery coordination activities with other programs. Background information and significance of the effort is adequately addressed. 2. Results and Adaptive ManagementThe proposal identifies problems with the achieving the project goals, including the loss of key personnel. The current effort involves a decision to switch hatchery production to the Prosser Hatchery. A Step Review will be conducted at a later date for new hatchery salmon production. It is not clear how the mitigation estimates were developed, so this part of the proposal is not reviewable. 3. Methods: Project Relationships, Work Types, and DeliverablesDeliverables include a brief discussion of meetings to ensure the project aligns and integrates with tribal fishery management strategies and other issues. |
|
Documentation Links: |
Assessment Number: | 2008-527-00-NPCC-20101026 |
---|---|
Project: | 2008-527-00 - Zone 6 Fishery (Prosser Hatchery Upgrades) |
Review: | RME / AP Category Review |
Proposal: | RMECAT-2008-527-00 |
Proposal State: | Pending BPA Response |
Approved Date: | 6/10/2011 |
Recommendation: | Under Review |
Comments: | Project implementation based on outcome of review process. |
Assessment Number: | 2008-527-00-ISRP-20101015 |
---|---|
Project: | 2008-527-00 - Zone 6 Fishery (Prosser Hatchery Upgrades) |
Review: | RME / AP Category Review |
Proposal Number: | RMECAT-2008-527-00 |
Completed Date: | 12/17/2010 |
Final Round ISRP Date: | 12/17/2010 |
Final Round ISRP Rating: | Not Applicable |
Final Round ISRP Comment: | |
Not applicable. This current proposal is not scientifically reviewable. If a plan or loss assessment design is developed that is scientifically reviewable the ISRP will review it, if requested.
As stated, “The goal of the proposed project is to provide the tribes with technical assistance in developing near-term reprogramming goals for the losses in production due to the construction of The Dalles and John Day dams and in implementing those reprogramming measures.” An associated objective is to implement in-place, in-kind mitigation that is consistent with the fulfillment of treaty fishing rights. The project will have three phases. The first phase is review and planning. The second phase is developing mitigation options. The third phase is implementing the preferred option. This project is now in the first phase – planning. The level of information in the proposal, however, is quite slim. For example, although the history of the issue is well explained, there is little structure to the proposal after that explanation. Although support to the tribes to re-evaluate the losses and mitigation options for the Dalles and John Day dams is reasonable and justified, the background of the individual chosen by CRITFC to execute the re-evaluation is not clearly presented. The proponent appears to have substantial administrative experience, but evidence of developing analysis of losses and analyzing mitigation options is not evident. A second concern is the integration of the mitigation solutions with the Council’s Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. The Council, Fish and Wildlife Program, and ISRP are not mentioned in the proposal as being included in those to be participants or topics in the discussions and negotiations, since the discussions are conducted under the auspices of US v Oregon. Many proposals for hatcheries are brought before Council, and reviews are requested from the ISRP. However, scientific and ecosystem based skepticism of the efficacy of the proposal or systemwide limits to production is often countered with an argument that the decision is policy based within the US v Oregon settlement. There should be language that any production initiatives should be consistent with the Council and APR, address the HSRG recommendations, and be subject to ISRP review if conducted under the Fish and Wildlife Program or receiving BPA funding, e.g., Lower Snake River Compensation Plan. |
|
First Round ISRP Date: | 10/18/2010 |
First Round ISRP Rating: | Not Applicable |
First Round ISRP Comment: | |
Not applicable. This current proposal is not scientifically reviewable. If a plan or loss assessment design is developed that is scientifically reviewable the ISRP will review it, if requested. As stated, “The goal of the proposed project is to provide the tribes with technical assistance in developing near-term reprogramming goals for the losses in production due to the construction of The Dalles and John Day dams and in implementing those reprogramming measures.” An associated objective is to implement in-place, in-kind mitigation that is consistent with the fulfillment of treaty fishing rights. The project will have three phases. The first phase is review and planning. The second phase is developing mitigation options. The third phase is implementing the preferred option. This project is now in the first phase – planning. The level of information in the proposal, however, is quite slim. For example, although the history of the issue is well explained, there is little structure to the proposal after that explanation. Although support to the tribes to re-evaluate the losses and mitigation options for the Dalles and John Day dams is reasonable and justified, the background of the individual chosen by CRITFC to execute the re-evaluation is not clearly presented. The proponent appears to have substantial administrative experience, but evidence of developing analysis of losses and analyzing mitigation options is not evident. A second concern is the integration of the mitigation solutions with the Council’s Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. The Council, Fish and Wildlife Program, and ISRP are not mentioned in the proposal as being included in those to be participants or topics in the discussions and negotiations, since the discussions are conducted under the auspices of US v Oregon. Many proposals for hatcheries are brought before Council, and reviews are requested from the ISRP. However, scientific and ecosystem based skepticism of the efficacy of the proposal or systemwide limits to production is often countered with an argument that the decision is policy based within the US v Oregon settlement. There should be language that any production initiatives should be consistent with the Council and APR, address the HSRG recommendations, and be subject to ISRP review if conducted under the Fish and Wildlife Program or receiving BPA funding, e.g., Lower Snake River Compensation Plan. |
|
Documentation Links: |
|
Assessment Number: | 2008-527-00-BIOP-20101105 |
---|---|
Project Number: | 2008-527-00 |
Review: | RME / AP Category Review |
Proposal Number: | RMECAT-2008-527-00 |
Completed Date: | None |
2008 FCRPS BiOp Workgroup Rating: | Supports 2008 FCRPS BiOp |
Comments: |
BiOp Workgroup Comments: No BiOp Workgroup Comments The BiOp RM&E Workgroups made the following determinations regarding the proposal's ability or need to support BiOp Research, Monitoring and Evaluation (RME) RPAs. If you have questions regarding these RPA association conclusions, please contact your BPA COTR and they will help clarify, or they will arrange further discussion with the appropriate RM&E Workgroup Leads. BiOp RPA associations for the proposed work are: (0) All Questionable RPA Associations () and All Deleted RPA Associations (0) |
Proponent Response: | |
|
Name | Role | Organization |
---|---|---|
Mike Matylewich | Technical Contact | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) |
Rob Lothrop | Supervisor | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) |
Christine Golightly | Interested Party | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) |
Richard Golden Jr (Inactive) | Interested Party | Bonneville Power Administration |
Amy Mai | Interested Party | Bonneville Power Administration |
Maureen (CRITFC) Hess (Inactive) | Project Lead | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) |
Chris Roe | Administrative Contact | Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) |
Andrew Traylor | Project Manager | Bonneville Power Administration |
Carolyn Sharp | Env. Compliance Lead | Bonneville Power Administration |