View and print project details including project summary, purpose, associations to Biological Opinions, and area. To learn more about any of the project properties, hold your mouse cursor over the field label.
Please Note: This project is the product of one or more merges and/or splits from other projects. Historical data automatically included here are limited to the current project and previous generation (the “parent” projects) only. The Project Relationships section details the nature of the relationships between this project and the previous generation. To learn about the complete ancestry of this project, please review the Project Relationships section on the Project Summary page of each parent project.
Province | Subbasin | % |
---|---|---|
Mountain Snake | Salmon | 100.00% |
To view all expenditures for all fiscal years, click "Project Exp. by FY"
To see more detailed project budget information, please visit the "Project Budget" page
Acct FY | Acct Type | Amount | Fund | Budget Decision | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY2020 | Expense | $1,292,361 | From: Fish Accord - Idaho | Accord Extensions (State of Idaho) 10/1/2018 | 10/01/2018 |
FY2020 | Expense | $104,991 | From: Fish Accord - Idaho | Fish Accord Transfers - ID - 1/29/20 | 01/29/2020 |
FY2020 | Expense | $50,890 | From: Fish Accord - Idaho | Fish Accord Transfers - ID - 1/29/20 | 01/29/2020 |
FY2020 | Expense | $4,025 | From: Fish Accord - Idaho | Fish Accord Transfers - ID - 1/29/20 | 01/29/2020 |
FY2021 | Expense | $1,308,516 | From: Fish Accord - Idaho | Accord Extensions (State of Idaho) 10/1/2018 | 10/01/2018 |
FY2021 | Expense | $228,300 | From: Fish Accord - Idaho | Accord Transfers (ID) 1/28/2021 | 01/28/2021 |
FY2021 | Expense | $333,631 | From: Fish Accord - Idaho | Accord Transfers (ID) 1/28/2021 | 01/28/2021 |
FY2021 | Expense | $208,451 | From: Fish Accord - Idaho | Accord Transfers (ID) 1/28/2021 | 01/28/2021 |
FY2022 | Expense | $1,324,872 | From: Fish Accord - Idaho | Accord Extensions (State of Idaho) 10/1/2018 | 10/01/2018 |
Number | Contractor Name | Title | Status | Total Contracted Amount | Dates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
47379
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2008-602-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION PLANNING | History | $33,345 | 6/1/2010 - 5/31/2011 |
48863
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION | Closed | $1,269,494 | 8/15/2010 - 8/14/2012 |
53200
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION PLANNING | Closed | $25,577 | 6/1/2011 - 5/31/2012 |
57487
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION PLANNING | Closed | $34,295 | 6/1/2012 - 5/31/2013 |
58410
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION | Closed | $737,044 | 8/15/2012 - 12/31/2012 |
59768
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION | Closed | $66,940 | 1/1/2013 - 12/31/2013 |
61357
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION PLANNING | Closed | $35,011 | 6/1/2013 - 5/31/2014 |
63697
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION | Closed | $767,704 | 1/1/2014 - 12/31/2014 |
65294
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION PLANNING | Closed | $17,122 | 6/1/2014 - 5/31/2015 |
67754
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION | Closed | $1,818,673 | 1/1/2015 - 12/31/2015 |
68742
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION PLANNING | Closed | $25,147 | 6/1/2015 - 5/31/2016 |
71307
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION | Closed | $1,843,628 | 1/1/2016 - 12/31/2016 |
72593
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION PLANNING | Closed | $33,563 | 6/1/2016 - 5/30/2017 |
75750
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION | Closed | $2,102,219 | 1/1/2017 - 2/28/2018 |
76169
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION PLANNING | Closed | $37,007 | 5/31/2017 - 5/31/2018 |
76913 REL 1
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION | Closed | $1,063,022 | 3/1/2018 - 2/28/2019 |
76913 REL 2
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION PLANNING | Closed | $25,956 | 6/1/2018 - 5/31/2019 |
76913 REL 9
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP SALMON BASIN RESTORATION | Closed | $1,343,472 | 3/1/2019 - 2/29/2020 |
76913 REL 17
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION | Issued | $1,452,267 | 3/1/2020 - 2/28/2021 |
CR-345071
![]() |
Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION | Pending | $2,078,898 | 3/1/2021 - 2/28/2022 |
Annual Progress Reports | |
---|---|
Expected (since FY2004): | 20 |
Completed: | 11 |
On time: | 11 |
Status Reports | |
---|---|
Completed: | 77 |
On time: | 12 |
Avg Days Late: | 13 |
Earliest | Subsequent | Accepted | Count of Contract Deliverables | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contract | Contract(s) | Title | Contractor | Start | End | Status | Reports | Complete | Green | Yellow | Red | Total | % Green and Complete | Canceled |
47379 | 53200, 57487, 61357, 65294, 68742, 72593, 76169, 76913 REL 2 | 2008-602-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION PLANNING | Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 06/2010 | 06/2010 | Closed | 36 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 44 | 88.64% | 1 |
48863 | 58410, 59768, 63697, 67754, 71307, 75750, 76913 REL 1, 76913 REL 9, 76913 REL 17 | 2010-072-00 EXP LEMHI RIVER RESTORATION | Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation | 08/2010 | 08/2010 | Pending | 41 | 259 | 16 | 0 | 72 | 347 | 79.25% | 21 |
Project Totals | 77 | 298 | 16 | 0 | 77 | 391 | 80.31% | 22 |
Assessment Number: | 2010-072-00-NPCC-20131126 |
---|---|
Project: | 2010-072-00 - Lemhi River Restoration |
Review: | 2013 Geographic Category Review |
Proposal: | GEOREV-2010-072-00 |
Proposal State: | Pending BPA Response |
Approved Date: | 11/5/2013 |
Recommendation: | Implement with Conditions |
Comments: | Implement through FY 2018. Also see Programmatic Issue and Recommendation A for effectiveness monitoring. |
Conditions: | |
Council Condition #1 Programmatic Issue: A. Implement Monitoring, and Evaluation at a Regional Scale—Also see Programmatic Issue and Recommendation A for effectiveness monitoring. |
Assessment Number: | 2010-072-00-ISRP-20130610 |
---|---|
Project: | 2010-072-00 - Lemhi River Restoration |
Review: | 2013 Geographic Category Review |
Proposal Number: | GEOREV-2010-072-00 |
Completed Date: | 6/11/2013 |
Final Round ISRP Date: | 6/10/2013 |
Final Round ISRP Rating: | Meets Scientific Review Criteria |
Final Round ISRP Comment: | |
This is a good, detailed proposal. The ISRP benefitted from the site visit and discussions with project sponsors, including key members of the ISEMP monitoring effort. The Lemhi habitat restoration program has a strategy for addressing previously identified limiting factors of water flow and access to habitat, improving salmonid habitat, and implementing a monitoring program (ISEMP, CHaMP, IMW) for documenting progress. The program demonstrates broad coordination among stakeholders, and it has a good working relationship with private property owners, based on observations during our site visit, and these relationships are essential for improving salmon habitat. Although not discussed in the proposal, the ISRP was encouraged by the use of Hayden Creek as a control stream when evaluating the response of salmonids to the reconnection of a number of disconnected tributaries to the mainstem Lemhi River. Given that many salmonids seem to emigrate from the Lemhi River prior to winter, the ISRP encourages the program to identify and evaluate overwintering habitat, which is an important life stage for maintaining survival. Overall, the proposal and information gained at the site visit provide an adequate response to the previous review by the ISRP (ISRP 2011-22). The comments below do not require a response by the sponsors. We provide these comments so that the sponsors may improve subsequent reports and proposals. 1. Purpose: Significance to Regional Programs, Technical Background, and Objectives The regional significance and background to this Accord project are adequately described. The physical setting, nature of the problem, and an approach to a solution is clearly presented. Three habitat-related objectives and one administrative objective are given. The habitat projects aim to improve passage, to improve riparian and aquatic habitat, and to increase and protect flow. Specificity of the objectives is shown in 32 detailed deliverables. Habitat projects implemented by this project were selected by project 2007-394-00, currently also under ISRP review. Projects selected for implementation under 2007-072-00 were previously vetted by the USBWP Technical Team and received support from the USBWP Advisory Committee. Nevertheless, the proposal provided rational for the habitat projects. The ISRP recognizes that planning and coordination efforts were intentionally split from implementation efforts, but this approach led to some redundancy and confusion. 2. History: Accomplishments, Results, and Adaptive Management (Evaluation of Results) This project merges two former projects with the renamed 2007-394-00, and these projects have been collectively restoring habitat in the Lemhi River since 1994 as the Model Watershed Program. In the problem statement, and elsewhere, the sponsor identifies that there are 2,950 points of water diversion in the Lemhi watershed and 191 stream-alteration permits recorded. Local staff stated a much lower number of water diversions at the site visit. A long list of completed projects since 2009 is provided along with a summary statement that estimation of fish response is difficult to measure but is under IDFG and NOAA responsibility through ISEMP and IMW activities. The sponsors noted that there has been some positive response of salmonids to the reconnection of streams. The Lemhi program appears to have a decent monitoring program in place for adults and juveniles, based on discussions during the site visit, and we look forward to seeing details on how salmonids are responding to the habitat projects throughout the Lemhi basin. Presently, there is no supplementation with hatchery fish and reportedly few hatchery strays, therefore the response of naturally-produced salmonids to habitat changes will be easier to detect. This project merges two former projects with the renamed 2007-394-00, and these projects have been collectively restoring habitat in the Lemhi River since 1994 as the Model Watershed Program. The proposal provides a long table of BPA funded projects implemented since 2009. These projects addressed key limiting factors for salmonids such as flow, fish passage, entrainment, riparian condition, and habitat complexity. Quantitative results of the habitat improvements were stated in the table. These projects and proposed projects have improved habitat quantity and quality. 3. Project Relationships, Emerging Limiting Factors, and Tailored Questions The proposal states that this project implements projects identified by project 2007-394-00, but the proposal also describes how projects are prioritized to address factors that limit salmonids. Water flow is a key limiting factor in this region, and the proposal addressed the implications of a changing climate on flow. 4. Deliverables, Work Elements, Metrics, and Methods Most of the proposed work is directed toward active in stream construction to address anthropogenic disturbance. There are 31 action deliverables and one administrative deliverable. Implementation of these 31 deliverables is a large undertaking, and it will be an important accomplishment. The proposal, in conjunction with the site visit, demonstrates that the sponsors have a strategy for improving salmonid habitat quantity and quality. |
|
First Round ISRP Date: | 6/10/2013 |
First Round ISRP Rating: | Meets Scientific Review Criteria |
First Round ISRP Comment: | |
This is a good, detailed proposal. The ISRP benefitted from the site visit and discussions with project sponsors, including key members of the ISEMP monitoring effort. The Lemhi habitat restoration program has a strategy for addressing previously identified limiting factors of water flow and access to habitat, improving salmonid habitat, and implementing a monitoring program (ISEMP, CHaMP, IMW) for documenting progress. The program demonstrates broad coordination among stakeholders, and it has a good working relationship with private property owners, based on observations during our site visit, and these relationships are essential for improving salmon habitat. Although not discussed in the proposal, the ISRP was encouraged by the use of Hayden Creek as a control stream when evaluating the response of salmonids to the reconnection of a number of disconnected tributaries to the mainstem Lemhi River. Given that many salmonids seem to emigrate from the Lemhi River prior to winter, the ISRP encourages the program to identify and evaluate overwintering habitat, which is an important life stage for maintaining survival. Overall, the proposal and information gained at the site visit provide an adequate response to the previous review by the ISRP (ISRP 2011-22). The comments below do not require a response by the sponsors. We provide these comments so that the sponsors may improve subsequent reports and proposals. 1. Purpose: Significance to Regional Programs, Technical Background, and Objectives The regional significance and background to this Accord project are adequately described. The physical setting, nature of the problem, and an approach to a solution is clearly presented. Three habitat-related objectives and one administrative objective are given. The habitat projects aim to improve passage, to improve riparian and aquatic habitat, and to increase and protect flow. Specificity of the objectives is shown in 32 detailed deliverables. Habitat projects implemented by this project were selected by project 2007-394-00, currently also under ISRP review. Projects selected for implementation under 2007-072-00 were previously vetted by the USBWP Technical Team and received support from the USBWP Advisory Committee. Nevertheless, the proposal provided rational for the habitat projects. The ISRP recognizes that planning and coordination efforts were intentionally split from implementation efforts, but this approach led to some redundancy and confusion. 2. History: Accomplishments, Results, and Adaptive Management (Evaluation of Results) This project merges two former projects with the renamed 2007-394-00, and these projects have been collectively restoring habitat in the Lemhi River since 1994 as the Model Watershed Program. In the problem statement, and elsewhere, the sponsor identifies that there are 2,950 points of water diversion in the Lemhi watershed and 191 stream-alteration permits recorded. Local staff stated a much lower number of water diversions at the site visit. A long list of completed projects since 2009 is provided along with a summary statement that estimation of fish response is difficult to measure but is under IDFG and NOAA responsibility through ISEMP and IMW activities. The sponsors noted that there has been some positive response of salmonids to the reconnection of streams. The Lemhi program appears to have a decent monitoring program in place for adults and juveniles, based on discussions during the site visit, and we look forward to seeing details on how salmonids are responding to the habitat projects throughout the Lemhi basin. Presently, there is no supplementation with hatchery fish and reportedly few hatchery strays, therefore the response of naturally-produced salmonids to habitat changes will be easier to detect. This project merges two former projects with the renamed 2007-394-00, and these projects have been collectively restoring habitat in the Lemhi River since 1994 as the Model Watershed Program. The proposal provides a long table of BPA funded projects implemented since 2009. These projects addressed key limiting factors for salmonids such as flow, fish passage, entrainment, riparian condition, and habitat complexity. Quantitative results of the habitat improvements were stated in the table. These projects and proposed projects have improved habitat quantity and quality. 3. Project Relationships, Emerging Limiting Factors, and Tailored Questions The proposal states that this project implements projects identified by project 2007-394-00, but the proposal also describes how projects are prioritized to address factors that limit salmonids. Water flow is a key limiting factor in this region, and the proposal addressed the implications of a changing climate on flow. 4. Deliverables, Work Elements, Metrics, and Methods Most of the proposed work is directed toward active in stream construction to address anthropogenic disturbance. There are 31 action deliverables and one administrative deliverable. Implementation of these 31 deliverables is a large undertaking, and it will be an important accomplishment. The proposal, in conjunction with the site visit, demonstrates that the sponsors have a strategy for improving salmonid habitat quantity and quality. Modified by Dal Marsters on 6/11/2013 2:01:37 PM. |
|
Documentation Links: |
Project Relationships: |
This project Merged From 2008-602-00 effective on 6/2/2010 Relationship Description: All work and budget from projects 2008-602-00 and 2008-606-00 are combined into 2010-072-00. This project Merged From 2008-606-00 effective on 6/2/2010 Relationship Description: All work and budget from projects 2008-602-00 and 2008-606-00 are combined into 2010-072-00. |
---|
Name | Role | Organization |
---|---|---|
Amy Hines | Project Lead | Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation |
Mike Edmondson | Supervisor | Idaho Governor's Office of Species Conservation |
Art Butts | Interested Party | Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) |
Robert Shull | Env. Compliance Lead | Bonneville Power Administration |
Dorothy Welch | Supervisor | Bonneville Power Administration |
Russell Scranton | Project SME | Bonneville Power Administration |
Eric Leitzinger | Project Manager | Bonneville Power Administration |